[RFC V2] OPP: Redefine bindings to overcome shortcomings

Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar at linaro.org
Fri Jan 23 04:55:05 PST 2015


On 23 January 2015 at 17:22, Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:39:14PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:

> I tend to agree that this is clearer.  It might be nice to have variants
> for specifying directly as a percentage but I don't think it's really
> worth the complexity.

> If we change the binding to be typ/min/max rather than min/typ/max then
> we could also do this by allowing either one or three values to be
> specified.  That might be more worth the complexity especially given...

+1

>> > +  - voltage-tolerance: Specify the CPU voltage tolerance in percentage.
>
>> Please let's drop this.
>
> DT bindings are supposed to be stable, this means the code should accept
> old bindings and they should be documented as deprecated.

Yes, I have marked the earlier OPP bindings as deprecated. Will mark
this one too separately.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list