[PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu: use a threaded handler for context interrupts
Will Deacon
will.deacon at arm.com
Fri Jan 23 03:24:15 PST 2015
Hi Mitch,
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:48:02PM +0000, Mitchel Humpherys wrote:
> Context interrupts can call domain-specific handlers which might sleep.
> Currently we register our handler with request_irq, so our handler is
> called in atomic context, so domain handlers that sleep result in an
> invalid context BUG. Fix this by using request_threaded_irq.
>
> This also prepares the way for doing things like enabling clocks within
> our interrupt handler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mitchel Humpherys <mitchelh at codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> index 6cd47b75286f..81f6b54d94b1 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -973,8 +973,9 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_domain_context(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&smmu_domain->lock, flags);
>
> irq = smmu->irqs[smmu->num_global_irqs + cfg->irptndx];
> - ret = request_irq(irq, arm_smmu_context_fault, IRQF_SHARED,
> - "arm-smmu-context-fault", domain);
> + ret = request_threaded_irq(irq, NULL, arm_smmu_context_fault,
> + IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_SHARED,
> + "arm-smmu-context-fault", domain);
> if (IS_ERR_VALUE(ret)) {
> dev_err(smmu->dev, "failed to request context IRQ %d (%u)\n",
> cfg->irptndx, irq);
I think I'd rather keep a simple atomic handler, then have a threaded
handler for actually issuing the report_iommu_fault. i.e. we only wake
the thread when it looks like there's some work to do. That also works
much better for shared interrupts.
Will
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list