[PATCH v3 2/3] mfd: lubbock_io: add lubbock_io board
Robert Jarzmik
robert.jarzmik at free.fr
Tue Jan 20 23:46:29 PST 2015
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux at arm.linux.org.uk> writes:
> What I'd suggest (and always have done) is:
>
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "couldn't request main irq%d: %d\n",
> irq, ret);
I like it, it's even more compact, I'll use it for next patch version.
> but I guess printing the IRQ number no longer makes sense with todays
> dynamic mapping of logical IRQ numbers, as it is no longer meaningful.
Yes ... we're not yet there with pxa gpio interrupts, maybe it will come
eventually one day.
For Lee:
> > > platform_get_irq()?
> > No. I need the flags.
> Where are they used?
A couple of lines below, using local "irqflags" variable :
ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, cot->irq, lubbock_irq_handler,
irqflags, dev_name(&pdev->dev), cot);
Cheers.
--
Robert
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list