[RFC/PATCH] arm: omap: hwmod: add debugfs interface
Felipe Balbi
balbi at ti.com
Tue Jan 20 07:11:44 PST 2015
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 08:36:03AM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 08:13:57AM +0000, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Jan 2015, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 5 Dec 2014, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > >
> > > > By exposing the details of hwmod structures
> > > > to debugfs we can much more easily verify
> > > > that changes to hwmod data is correct and won't
> > > > cause regressions.
> > > >
> > > > The idea is that this can be used to check the
> > > > state of one hwmod, verify hwmod sysc fields, etc.
> > > >
> > > > For example, this will be used to move some of
> > > > the sysc fields to DT and later verify that they
> > > > are correct pre- and post-patch.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi at ti.com>
> > >
> > > This one had a bunch of unnecessary includes and checkpatch issues
> > > (below). I cleaned those up here and have queued the result (also below)
> > > for v3.20.
> >
> > ... and, the patch doesn't even boot. Dropped.
> >
> > If you really want something like this to be merged, resend a version that
> > boots, and has checkpatch warnings fixed and unnecessary includes dropped.
> > Otherwise you're just wasting my time.
>
> you're using a really old version, though. There have been other
> versions which are still under discussion.
not to mention that this was an RFC, not meant for merging at the time
it was sent.
--
balbi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20150120/d50f40c9/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list