[PATCHv3 2/8] devfreq: exynos: Add documentation for generic exynos memory bus frequency driver
Viresh Kumar
viresh.kumar at linaro.org
Mon Jan 19 23:19:15 PST 2015
On 9 January 2015 at 02:48, Rob Herring <robherring2 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Adding Viresh.
Sorry for being too late, I was very busy with other cpufreq stuff I was doing
and saved this thread for later as it required me to understand it properly..
>> +Required properties for memory bus block:
>> +- clock-names : the name of clock used by the memory bus, "memory-bus".
>> +- clocks : phandles for clock specified in "clock-names" property.
>> +- #clock-cells: should be 1.
>> +- frequency: the frequency table to support DVFS feature.
>
> So you have just defined a new OPP table format. We already have one
> and Viresh is working to create a more extendable one. He asked about
> what's needed in devfreq, so Viresh here you go. :)
I failed to understand what's new here, probably I need more clarity on
what we are doing here..
So, this is what I see from OPPs point of view, everything else stripped out.
>> + memory_bus_int: memory_bus at 1 {
>> + operating-points = <
>> + 400000 950000
>> + 200000 950000
>> + 133000 925000
>> + 100000 850000
>> + 80000 850000
>> + 50000 850000>;
So these are the OPPs your "groups" support and below ones are
the frequencies that each block will support. Right ?
>> + blocks {
>> + frequency = <
>> + 100000
>> + 100000
>> + 100000
>> + 100000
Why this replication here ?
>> + 50000
>> + 50000>;
>> + };
How are the above two tables (operating-points and frequency) related
here? What about the voltages at which these frequencies are possible ?
>> + display_block: memory_bus_block2 {
>> + frequency = <
>> + 200000
>> + 160000
>> + 100000
>> + 80000
>> + 80000
>> + 50000>;
>> + };
>> + isp_block: memory_bus_block3 {
>> + frequency = <
>> + 200000
>> + 200000
>> + 100000
>> + 80000
>> + 50000
>> + 50000>;
>> + };
>> + gps_block: memory_bus_block4 {
>> + frequency = <
>> + 300000
>> + 200000
>> + 133000
>> + 100000
>> + 50000
>> + 50000>;
>> + };
same for others as well..
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list