[PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: add cpufreq driver for Mediatek MT8173 SoC

[Pi-Cheng Chen]

On 20 January 2015 at 00:00, Mike Turquette <mturquette at linaro.org> wrote:
> Quoting pi-cheng.chen (2015-01-09 01:54:51)
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/mt8173-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/mt8173-cpufreq.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..b578c10
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/mt8173-cpufreq.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,459 @@

Hello Mike,

>
> Hello Pi-Cheng,
>
> <snip>
>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
>> +#include <linux/cpufreq-dt.h>
>> +#include <linux/cpumask.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
>
> I'll echo what Viresh said here. CPUfreq drivers should typically be
> clock consumers and only require clk.h, not clk-provider.h. More on that
> below.
>

I included it because of the __clk_lookup call. But yes, I will use the clk_get
to get the intermediate clock to get rid of this.

> <snip>
>
>> +static void cpuclk_mux_set(int cluster, u32 sel)
>> +{
>> +       u32 val;
>> +       u32 mask = 0x3;
>> +
>> +       if (cluster == BIG_CLUSTER) {
>> +               mask <<= 2;
>> +               sel <<= 2;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       spin_lock(&lock);
>> +
>> +       val = readl(clk_mux_regs);
>> +       val = (val & ~mask) | sel;
>> +       writel(val, clk_mux_regs);
>> +
>> +       spin_unlock(&lock);
>> +}
>
> Is cpuclk a mux that is represented in the MT8173 clock driver? It looks
> like a clock that belong to the clock driver, but this cpufreq driver is
> writing to that register directly.
>

Yes, it's a mux but not presented in MT8173 clock driver yet. Therefore I
map the HW register and writing them directly to do reparent. I will get
rid of it once I got those muxes presented in MT8173 clock driver.

> <snip>
>
>> +static int mt8173_cpufreq_dvfs_info_init(void)
>> +{
>
> <snip>
>
>> +       mainpll = __clk_lookup("mainpll");
>> +       if (!mainpll) {
>> +               pr_err("failed to get mainpll clk\n");
>> +               ret = -ENOENT;
>> +               goto dvfs_info_release;
>> +       }
>> +       mainpll_freq = clk_get_rate(mainpll);
>
> This is definitely bad. Why not use clk_get() here? __clk_lookup should
> not be exposed to clock consumer drivers (and I hope to get rid of it
> completely some day).
>

Thanks for pointing me out the right API to do it. I will fix it in
next version.

Best Regards,
Pi-Cheng

> Regards,
> Mike