[PATCH v7 00/17] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
Jason Cooper
jason at lakedaemon.net
Thu Jan 15 12:04:37 PST 2015
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 07:02:20PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 06:23:47PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +0000, Grant Likely wrote:
>
> > > I'll get right to the point: Can we please have this series queued up
> > > for v3.20?
>
> > Before you even ask for this, please look at the patches and realise
> > that there is a complete lack of Reviewed-by tags on the code (well,
> > apart from trivial Kconfig changes). In addition, the series touches on
> > other subsystems like clocksource, irqchip, acpi and I don't see any
> > acks from the corresponding maintainers. So even if I wanted to merge
> > the series, there is no way it can be done without additional
> > reviews/acks. On the document (last patch), I'd like to see a statement
>
> There's probably a bit of a process problem here - these patches are all
> being posted as part of big and apparently controversial threads with
> subject lines in the form "ARM / ACPI:" so people could be forgiven for
> just not even reading the e-mails enough to notice changes to their
> subsystems. Is it worth posting those patches separately more directly
> to the relevant maintainers?
I think it's beneficial to post the entire series as one thread, but to
change the subject line of each patch to adequately reflect the affected
subsystem.
thx,
Jason.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list