[PATCHv2 0/7] arm64/kvm: common ESR_ELx definitions and decoding
mark.rutland at arm.com
Thu Jan 15 04:42:51 PST 2015
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 07:44:40PM +0000, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 04:45:13PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > Currently we have two sets of macros used for ESR_ELx handling, one used
> > by core arm64 code and the other used by KVM. These differ slightly in
> > naming convention and style of definition.
> > This patch series introduces and migrates all users to a common set of
> > macros for ESR_ELx handling, preventing further drift.
> > Additionally this series adds exception class decoding when reporting
> > exceptions, saving deveopers from having to perform tedious mental
> > arithmetic to figure out what the likely cause of an unexpected
> > exception was.
> > Since v1 :
> > * Reorder patches to maintain KVM bisectability.
> > * Fix bad definitions (ESR_ELx_SAS and ESR_ELx_FSC_PERM).
> > * Introcuce ESR_ELx_SAS_SHIFT and undo bad rework of
> > kvm_vcpu_dabt_get_as.
> > * Make "Unallocated EC" comments consistent in ESR_ELx_EC_* definition
> > list.
> For the series:
> Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall at linaro.org>
> I also tested this with KVM on APM XGene and Juno with UEFI+Linux as a
Thanks, Christoffer. It's much appreciated.
Catalin, Christoffer, do you have a preferred path for merging this?
Should this go through the arm64 or KVM tree as a whole?
For now I've placed the whole series on a branch based on v3.19-rc3:
More information about the linux-arm-kernel