[PATCH v3 14/21] ARM: imx6: convert GPC to stacked domains
Marc Zyngier
marc.zyngier at arm.com
Tue Jan 13 10:34:46 PST 2015
On 12/01/15 19:00, Stefan Agner wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> On 2015-01-12 19:26, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> IMX6 has been (ab)using the gic_arch_extn to provide
>> wakeup from suspend, and it makes a lot of sense to convert
>> this code to use stacked domains instead.
>>
>> This patch does just this, updating the DT files to actually
>> reflect what the HW provides.
>>
>> BIG FAT WARNING: because the DTs were so far lying by not
>> exposing the fact that the GPC block is actually the first
>> interrupt controller in the chain, kernels with this patch
>> applied wont have any suspend-resume facility when booted
>> with old DTs, and old kernels with updated DTs won't even boot.
>>
>> Tested-by: Stefan Agner <stefan at agner.ch>
>> Acked-by: Stefan Agner <stefan at agner.ch>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi | 7 ++-
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sl.dtsi | 5 +-
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx.dtsi | 5 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-imx/common.h | 1 -
>> arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>> arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c | 1 -
>> arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6sl.c | 1 -
>> arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6sx.c | 1 -
>> 8 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
>> index 4fc03b7..aff9ded 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
>> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
>> interrupt-controller;
>> reg = <0x00a01000 0x1000>,
>> <0x00a00100 0x100>;
>> + interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
>> };
>>
>> clocks {
>> @@ -82,7 +83,7 @@
>> #address-cells = <1>;
>> #size-cells = <1>;
>> compatible = "simple-bus";
>> - interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
>> + interrupt-parent = <&gpc>;
>> ranges;
>>
>> dma_apbh: dma-apbh at 00110000 {
>> @@ -122,6 +123,7 @@
>> compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-twd-timer";
>> reg = <0x00a00600 0x20>;
>> interrupts = <1 13 0xf01>;
>> + interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
>> clocks = <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_TWD>;
>> };
>>
>> @@ -694,8 +696,11 @@
>> gpc: gpc at 020dc000 {
>> compatible = "fsl,imx6q-gpc";
>> reg = <0x020dc000 0x4000>;
>> + interrupt-controller;
>> + #interrupt-cells = <3>;
>> interrupts = <0 89 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>> <0 90 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> + interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
>> };
>>
>> gpr: iomuxc-gpr at 020e0000 {
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sl.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sl.dtsi
>> index 36ab8e0..35099b7 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sl.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sl.dtsi
>> @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@
>> interrupt-controller;
>> reg = <0x00a01000 0x1000>,
>> <0x00a00100 0x100>;
>> + interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
>> };
>>
>> clocks {
>> @@ -95,7 +96,7 @@
>> #address-cells = <1>;
>> #size-cells = <1>;
>> compatible = "simple-bus";
>> - interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
>> + interrupt-parent = <&gpc>;
>> ranges;
>>
>> ocram: sram at 00900000 {
>> @@ -603,7 +604,9 @@
>> gpc: gpc at 020dc000 {
>> compatible = "fsl,imx6sl-gpc", "fsl,imx6q-gpc";
>> reg = <0x020dc000 0x4000>;
>> + interrupt-controller;
>
> GPC is in three base device trees, and missing in all of them. So the
> first is fixed
>
> this one...
>
>> interrupts = <0 89 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> + interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
>> };
>>
>> gpr: iomuxc-gpr at 020e0000 {
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx.dtsi
>> index 7a24fee..c476e67 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx.dtsi
>> @@ -88,6 +88,7 @@
>> interrupt-controller;
>> reg = <0x00a01000 0x1000>,
>> <0x00a00100 0x100>;
>> + interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
>> };
>>
>> clocks {
>> @@ -131,7 +132,7 @@
>> #address-cells = <1>;
>> #size-cells = <1>;
>> compatible = "simple-bus";
>> - interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
>> + interrupt-parent = <&gpc>;
>> ranges;
>>
>> pmu {
>> @@ -700,7 +701,9 @@
>> gpc: gpc at 020dc000 {
>> compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-gpc", "fsl,imx6q-gpc";
>> reg = <0x020dc000 0x4000>;
>> + interrupt-controller;
>
>
> ... and this one is still missing.
>
> Sorry I did not see that the first review.
I thought I had them fixed on Sunday, but it looks like I've dropped the
fixup when rebasing. Oh well.
Thanks for the heads up, I'll squash that into the existing patch.
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list