[PATCH 6/7] ARM: at91: remove useless at91rm9200_dt_initialize()

[Bo Shen]

Hi Alexandre,

On 01/13/2015 02:42 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> at91rm9200_dt_initialize() is doing the same as at91_dit_initialize(), use that

s/at91_dit_initialize/at91_dt_initialize

> one instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni at free-electrons.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-rm9200.c | 2 +-
>   arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h         | 1 -
>   arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c           | 7 -------
>   3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-rm9200.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-rm9200.c
> index 76dfe8f9af50..a15ab6f8de00 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-rm9200.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-rm9200.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,6 @@ static const char *at91rm9200_dt_board_compat[] __initdata = {
>   DT_MACHINE_START(at91rm9200_dt, "Atmel AT91RM9200 (Device Tree)")
>   	.init_time      = at91rm9200_dt_timer_init,
>   	.map_io		= at91_map_io,
> -	.init_early	= at91rm9200_dt_initialize,
> +	.init_early	= at91_dt_initialize,
>   	.dt_compat	= at91rm9200_dt_board_compat,
>   MACHINE_END
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h b/arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h
> index e0368aa06390..c10c2ddaae6d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h
> @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ extern void __init at91_init_sram(int bank, unsigned long base,
>
>    /* Processors */
>   extern void __init at91rm9200_set_type(int type);
> -extern void __init at91rm9200_dt_initialize(void);
>   extern void __init at91_dt_initialize(void);
>
>    /* Timer */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
> index ce25e85720fb..acb8d7724609 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
> @@ -429,13 +429,6 @@ static void at91_dt_ramc(void)
>   	at91_pm_set_standby(standby);
>   }
>
> -void __init at91rm9200_dt_initialize(void)
> -{
> -	at91_dt_ramc();
> -
> -	at91_boot_soc.init();
> -}
> -
>   void __init at91_dt_initialize(void)
>   {
>   	at91_dt_ramc();
>

Best Regards,
Bo Shen