[PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: ARM: on IO mem abort - route the call to KVM MMIO bus
Eric Auger
eric.auger at linaro.org
Mon Jan 12 09:09:13 PST 2015
Hi Nikolay,
On 12/07/2014 10:37 AM, Nikolay Nikolaev wrote:
> On IO memory abort, try to handle the MMIO access thorugh the KVM
> registered read/write callbacks. This is done by invoking the relevant
> kvm_io_bus_* API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Nikolaev <n.nikolaev at virtualopensystems.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/kvm/mmio.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/mmio.c b/arch/arm/kvm/mmio.c
> index 4cb5a93..e42469f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/mmio.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/mmio.c
> @@ -162,6 +162,36 @@ static int decode_hsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * handle_kernel_mmio - handle an in-kernel MMIO access
> + * @vcpu: pointer to the vcpu performing the access
> + * @run: pointer to the kvm_run structure
> + * @mmio: pointer to the data describing the access
> + *
> + * returns true if the MMIO access has been performed in kernel space,
> + * and false if it needs to be emulated in user space.
> + */
> +static bool handle_kernel_mmio(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run,
> + struct kvm_exit_mmio *mmio)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (mmio->is_write) {
> + ret = kvm_io_bus_write(vcpu, KVM_MMIO_BUS, mmio->phys_addr,
> + mmio->len, &mmio->data);
> +
> + } else {
> + ret = kvm_io_bus_read(vcpu, KVM_MMIO_BUS, mmio->phys_addr,
> + mmio->len, &mmio->data);
> + }
> + if (!ret) {
> + kvm_prepare_mmio(run, mmio);
> + kvm_handle_mmio_return(vcpu, run);
> + }
> +
> + return !ret;
in case ret < 0 (-EOPNOTSUPP = -95) aren't we returning true too? return
(ret==0)?
> +}
> +
> int io_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run,
> phys_addr_t fault_ipa)
> {
> @@ -200,6 +230,9 @@ int io_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run,
> if (vgic_handle_mmio(vcpu, run, &mmio))
> return 1;
>
> + if (handle_kernel_mmio(vcpu, run, &mmio))
> + return 1;
> +
> kvm_prepare_mmio(run, &mmio);
> return 0;
currently the io_mem_abort returned value is not used by mmu.c code. I
think this should be handed in kvm_handle_guest_abort. What do you think?
Best Regards
Eric
> }
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list