[PATCH v4 6/8] arm64/efi: move SetVirtualAddressMap() to UEFI stub
Matt Fleming
matt at codeblueprint.co.uk
Mon Jan 12 02:43:39 PST 2015
On Tue, 06 Jan, at 06:01:20PM, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 04:54:02PM +0000, Matt Fleming wrote:
>
> I think all we really need above what efi_get_memory_map() provides is
> the scratch space. Would we care about temporarily wasting a little
> bit of EFI_LOADER_DATA on all platforms, or could we just swap the
> function body in efi-stub-helper.c for Ard's version above?
>
> (I would guess memory maps with <= 32 entries are uncommon anyway, so
> the existing version would already make the bootservice call twice.)
I've no concerns about using the additional scratch space.
[...]
> Mmm, not optimal.
> That said, the only arm*-specific things about this particular
> function are the page sizes. Should this move to efi-stub-helper.c
> with EFI_RT_VIRTUAL_BASE moved to arch/<x>/include/asm/efi.h and
> joined by EFI_RT_VIRTUAL_BASE_ALIGN and EFI_RT_VIRTUAL_REGION_ALIGN?
Yeah, that would be an improvement. It's possible we could reuse some of
this code for x86's EFI virtual mapping code that Borislav wrote
(maybe).
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list