[PATCH] irqchip: omap-intc: fix legacy DMA regression
Tony Lindgren
tony at atomide.com
Tue Jan 6 10:30:22 PST 2015
* Russell King - ARM Linux <linux at arm.linux.org.uk> [150106 10:08]:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 10:51:33AM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > + /*
> > + * FIXME legacy OMAP DMA driver sitting under arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c
> > + * depends is still not ready for linear IRQ domains; because of that
> > + * we need to temporarily "blacklist" OMAP2 and OMAP3 devices from using
> > + * linear IRQ Domain until that driver is finally fixed.
>
> "finally fixed" or finally killed off like it really needs to be, once
> all users of it are killed.
>
> We've been trying to do this for, what, three years now... I finally
> pushed a WARN_ON() into that code to make it obvious to anyone who
> uses omap_request_dma() that they really need to update their code.
>
> Here's the list of references to that symbol which *still* need to be
> fixed so that we can kill the legacy DMA driver:
>
> drivers/media/platform/omap/omap_vout_vrfb.c: ret = omap_request_dma(vout->vrfb_dma_tx.dev_id, "VRFB DMA TX",
> drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isphist.c: ret = omap_request_dma(OMAP24XX_DMA_NO_DEVICE, "DMA_ISP_HIST",
> drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/omap1_camera.c: err = omap_request_dma(OMAP_DMA_CAMERA_IF_RX, DRIVER_NAME,
> drivers/mtd/onenand/omap2.c: r = omap_request_dma(0, pdev->dev.driver->name,
AFAIK we should just remove DMA support from the drivers above.
Nobody seems to be interested in doing anything about them.
> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/omap_udc.c: status = omap_request_dma(dma_channel,
> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/omap_udc.c: status = omap_request_dma(dma_channel,
OK so Aaro picked this one.
> drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010_omap.c: ret = omap_request_dma(chdat->sync_dev, dev_name,
> drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010_omap.c: ret = omap_request_dma(tusb_dma->sync_dev, "TUSB shared",
I'll update this one. FYI, I already have some work-in-progress
MUSB DMA patches that allow building in all the MUSB DMA glue
layers. I just need to finish that series for v3.20:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap.git/log/?h=musb-dma-2014-11-25-v2
So converting tusb6010 over to the dmaengine API would be the
next logical step after that series. Probably not going to
happen before v3.21 though..
Regards,
Tony
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list