AT91 slow clock mode regression/fixes, improvement proposal
sylvain.rochet at finsecur.com
Tue Jan 6 06:25:28 PST 2015
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 03:32:42AM +0000, Yang, Wenyou wrote:
> I remembered you said this patch is not formal. Now, would you like
> send a formal one?
Here it is, the first one is based on linux-at91/linux-3.10-at91 branch,
the second one is rebased on linux-3.18 (Is this the right way when
playing with multiple branch?).
By the way, Wenyou fixed some bugs in the linux-3.10-at91 branch about
slow clock mode which should IMHO be merged and pushed to other
More information about the linux-arm-kernel