[PATCH v6 00/17] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
Hanjun Guo
hanjun.guo at linaro.org
Sun Jan 4 02:55:01 PST 2015
Hi,
This is the sixth version of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI
5.1.
updates from v5:
- fix the NULL pointer reference in cpu_get_ops() if PSCI is absent
and NULL will passed, which found by Suravee when he was testing
those patches on Seattle platform. I added his Tested-by for all
those ACPI patches.
- Rebased on 3.19-rc2 which ACPI table related patches already merged
into 3.19 by Rafael, and remove the first patch in v5 which is not needed
any more.
- Add two cleanup patches to convert ACPI ID to physical ID to make the
ACPI core looks more ARCH agnostic, those two patches were expected going
into 3.19 but conflicted with IOAPIC hotplug patches so Rafael left them
for 3.20.
- updates to the doc about ACPI on ARM to address comments from Catalin,
Timur, Ashwin. continue discussion will bw needed about this doc.
- we did lots of work as Al pointed out in the "[RFC] ACPI on arm64 TODO List"
thread [1], and we already make FWTS running on ARM64, thanks FuWei for doing
that. Here is the test results for linaro leg kernel release test results:
Test report for leg-20141215.0 (Revision: d37eefeb160cc9cc1db997031793723e317be7b7)
This test Image comes from https://ci.linaro.org/job/linux-leg-fuwei
The CI job Link: https://ci.linaro.org/job/linux-leg-fuwei/37/
Notes : All the tests ran on FVP base model in LAVA server : http://validation.linaro.org/
The startup.nsh boot test Link :https://validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/222779
The ACPI test Link : https://validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/222781
The results.log file Link : https://validation.linaro.org/dashboard/attachment/1267957/view
The grub-install test Link : https://validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/222780
and here is the *summary*:
summary -SUM:77 passed, 6 failed, 2 warnings, 5 aborted, 186 skipped, 8 info only.
summary -NLN:
summary -SUM:Test Failure Summary
summary -SEP:===========================================================================================
summary -NLN:
summary -SUM:Critical failures: NONE
summary -NLN:
summary -SUM:High failures: 2
summary -SUM: uefirttime: Failed to get wakeup time with UEFI runtime service.
summary -SUM: uefirttime: Failed to set wakeup time with UEFI runtime service.
summary -NLN:
summary -SUM:Medium failures: 5
summary -SUM: wakealarm: Could not find an RTC with an alarm ioctl() interface.
summary -SUM: method: \_SB_.COM0._CID returned a string 'PL011' but it was not a valid PNP ID or a valid ACPI ID.
summary -SUM: method: Object _PRS did not exist.
summary -SUM: method: Object _PTS did not exist.
summary -SUM: method: Object _WAK did not exist.
summary -NLN:
summary -SUM:Low failures: NONE
summary -NLN:
summary -SUM:Other failures: NONE
summary -NLN:
summary -SUM:Test |Pass |Fail |Abort|Warn |Skip |Info |
summary -SUM:---------------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
summary -SUM:acpidump | | | | | | 1|
summary -SUM:acpiinfo | | | | | | 3|
summary -SUM:acpitables | 11| | | 1| | |
summary -SUM:aspm | | | | | 1| |
summary -SUM:checksum | 8| | | | | |
summary -SUM:cpufreq | | | | 1| | |
summary -SUM:crsdump | | | | | | |
summary -SUM:gpedump | | | | | | |
summary -SUM:hda_audio | | | | | 1| |
summary -SUM:klog | 1| | | | | |
summary -SUM:maxreadreq | | | | | | |
summary -SUM:method | 29| 4| | | 173| |
summary -SUM:oops | 2| | | | | |
summary -SUM:plddump | | | | | | |
summary -SUM:prsdump | | | | | | |
summary -SUM:securebootcert | | | 1| | | |
summary -SUM:syntaxcheck | 1| | | | | |
summary -SUM:uefibootpath | 1| | | | | |
summary -SUM:uefidump | | | | | | |
summary -SUM:uefirtmisc | 2| | | | 10| |
summary -SUM:uefirttime | 2| 2| | | | |
summary -SUM:uefirtvariable | 20| | | | | |
summary -SUM:uefivarinfo | | | | | | |
summary -SUM:version | | | | | 1| 4|
summary -SUM:wakealarm | | | 4| | | |
summary -SUM:---------------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
summary -SUM:Total: | 77| 6| 5| 2| 186| 8|
summary -SUM:---------------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
[1]: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-December/310921.html
Thanks
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list