[PATCH v5 0/4] Fixes for SDIO interrupts for dw_mmc
Javier Martinez Canillas
javier at dowhile0.org
Fri Jan 2 02:28:48 PST 2015
Hello Ulf,
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson at linaro.org> wrote:
> On 19 December 2014 at 20:02, Doug Anderson <dianders at chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>>> It was a bit hard to follow the
>>> updated the revisions, please don't send patches "in-reply-to" for
>>> future sets.
>>
>> Very strange. I didn't send out anything in-reply-to other than what
>> git-send-email usually does. I believe I had:
>>
>> [0] - no in reply to.
>> [1] - in reply to [0]
>> [2] - in reply to [0]
>> [3] - in reply to [0]
>> [4] - in reply to [0]
>
> That's good. As long as there are no in-reply to previous versions of
> patches/patchsets.
>
> I am using gmails web-based client so it could very well be that it
> does some magic, which I am not yet aware of.
>
I think that you were confused because Gmail's "conversation view"
groups emails in a thread not by the email subject but by the email
body.
So if a new revision of a series is sent and a patch did not change
from the previous version, Gmail will add it to the old patch thread
since the body is basically the same even when a version is present in
the subject (e.g: PATCH v2 foo).
I found that annoying as well so I disabled conversation view going to
Gmail's settings -> General -> Conversation view off
Hope it helps.
Best regards,
Javier
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list