[PATCH 3/7] drivers: Introduce new eFuse subsystem stub

Paul Bolle pebolle at tiscali.nl
Sat Feb 28 07:45:28 PST 2015


On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 08:45 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> This commit introduces a new eFuse subsystem stub to hold all the eFuse-like
> device drivers. This will be used to host the currently supported Tegra
> eFuse driver, and will allow to add support for other platforms as well.
> 
> Cc: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com>
> Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren at wwwdotorg.org>
> Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard at free-electrons.com>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>
> Cc: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren at i2se.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia at imgtec.com>
> ---
>  drivers/Kconfig        | 2 ++
>  drivers/Makefile       | 1 +
>  drivers/efuse/Kconfig  | 3 +++
>  drivers/efuse/Makefile | 0
>  4 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/efuse/Kconfig
>  create mode 100644 drivers/efuse/Makefile
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/Kconfig b/drivers/Kconfig
> index c0cc96b..9c0d93d 100644
> --- a/drivers/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/Kconfig
> @@ -146,6 +146,8 @@ source "drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig"
>  
>  source "drivers/rpmsg/Kconfig"
>  
> +source "drivers/efuse/Kconfig"
> +
>  source "drivers/soc/Kconfig"
>  
>  source "drivers/devfreq/Kconfig"
> diff --git a/drivers/Makefile b/drivers/Makefile
> index 527a6da..5572728 100644
> --- a/drivers/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/Makefile
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ obj-y				+= amba/
>  obj-$(CONFIG_DMADEVICES)	+= dma/
>  
>  # SOC specific infrastructure drivers.
> +obj-y				+= efuse/
>  obj-y				+= soc/
>  
>  obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO)		+= virtio/
> diff --git a/drivers/efuse/Kconfig b/drivers/efuse/Kconfig
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..617476f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/efuse/Kconfig
> @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
> +menu "eFuse drivers"
> +
> +endmenu

This adds an empty entry.

> diff --git a/drivers/efuse/Makefile b/drivers/efuse/Makefile
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..e69de29

And this adds an empty file. Odd.

Is there a reason why this can't be merged into 4/7?


Paul Bolle




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list