[PATCH v4 1/8] arm64: exynos5433: Enable ARMv8 based Exynos5433 (SoC) support
Chanwoo Choi
cwchoi00 at gmail.com
Fri Feb 27 16:51:14 PST 2015
Hi Kukjin and Sylwester,
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi at samsung.com> wrote:
> On 02/24/2015 05:31 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Tuesday 24 February 2015 14:16:44 Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>>> index 1b8e973..d83cea0 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>>> @@ -154,6 +154,17 @@ config ARCH_EXYNOS
>>> help
>>> This enables support for Samsung Exynos SoC family
>>>
>>> +config ARCH_EXYNOS5433
>>> + bool "ARMv8 based Samsung Exynos5433"
>>> + select ARCH_EXYNOS
>>> + select COMMON_CLK_SAMSUNG
>>> + select HAVE_S3C_RTC if RTC_CLASS
>>> + select PINCTRL
>>> + select PINCTRL_EXYNOS
>>> +
>>> + help
>>> + This enables support for Samsung Exynos5433 SoC family
>>> +
>>> config ARCH_EXYNOS7
>>> bool "ARMv8 based Samsung Exynos7"
>>> select ARCH_EXYNOS
>>> --
>>>
>>
>> Can we collapse all these entries into one for EXYNOS? I don't
>> want to end up with endless lists like we have on arm32 when
>> there is no platform specific code that is actually controlled
>> by this anway.
>
> I agree.
>
> I check the some issue for only using the CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS
> insead of CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS7 and CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS5433.
>
> Each CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS{7|5433} configuraiton was used on following list:
> - CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS7
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/Makefile:1:dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS7) += exynos7-espresso.dtb
> drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile:17:obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS7) += clk-exynos7.o
> - CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS5433
> drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile:13:obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS5433) += clk-exynos5433.o
>
> We may can fix it as following by only using 'CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS' without any specific configuration.
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/Makefile:1:dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS) += exynos7-espresso.dtb
> drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile:17:obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS) += clk-exynos7.o clk-exynos5433.o
>
> I think that we need the opinion of Kukjin Kim (Exynos SoC Maintainer)
> and Sylwester Nawrocki(Samsung clock Maintainer)
I need yout opinion about using the CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS
instead of CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS7/CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS5433?
Thanks,
Chanwoo Choi
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list