[PATCH v2] ARM: Don't use complete() during __cpu_die
Nicolas Pitre
nico at fluxnic.net
Wed Feb 25 12:16:59 PST 2015
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>
> > We could just use the spin-and-poll solution instead of an IPI, but
> > I really don't like that - when you see the complexity needed to
> > re-initialise it each time, it quickly becomes very yucky because
> > there is no well defined order between __cpu_die() and __cpu_kill()
> > being called by the two respective CPUs.
> >
> > The last patch I saw doing that had multiple bits to indicate success
> > and timeout, and rather a lot of complexity to recover from failures,
> > and reinitialise state for a second CPU going down.
>
> What about a per CPU state? That would at least avoid the need to
> serialize things across CPUs. If only one CPU may write its state, that
> should eliminate the need for any kind of locking.
Something like the following? If according to $subject it is the
complete() usage that has problems, then this replacement certainly has
it removed while keeping things simple. And I doubt CPU hotplug is
performance critical so a simple polling is certainly good enough.
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
index 86ef244c5a..f253f79a34 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ int __cpu_disable(void)
return 0;
}
-static DECLARE_COMPLETION(cpu_died);
+static struct cpumask dead_cpus;
/*
* called on the thread which is asking for a CPU to be shutdown -
@@ -221,7 +221,14 @@ static DECLARE_COMPLETION(cpu_died);
*/
void __cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)
{
- if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&cpu_died, msecs_to_jiffies(5000))) {
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 5 * HZ; i > 0; i -= 10) {
+ if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &dead_cpus))
+ break;
+ schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(10);
+ }
+ if (i <= 0) {
pr_err("CPU%u: cpu didn't die\n", cpu);
return;
}
@@ -267,12 +274,12 @@ void __ref cpu_die(void)
* this returns, power and/or clocks can be removed at any point
* from this CPU and its cache by platform_cpu_kill().
*/
- complete(&cpu_died);
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &dead_cpus);
/*
- * Ensure that the cache lines associated with that completion are
+ * Ensure that the cache line associated with that dead_cpus update is
* written out. This covers the case where _this_ CPU is doing the
- * powering down, to ensure that the completion is visible to the
+ * powering down, to ensure that the update is visible to the
* CPU waiting for this one.
*/
flush_cache_louis();
@@ -349,6 +356,8 @@ asmlinkage void secondary_start_kernel(void)
current->active_mm = mm;
cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(mm));
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &dead_cpus);
+
cpu_init();
pr_debug("CPU%u: Booted secondary processor\n", cpu);
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list