[PATCH 1/3] arm64: mediatek: Add config option for mt8173.
arnd at arndb.de
Wed Feb 25 02:51:57 PST 2015
On Wednesday 25 February 2015 17:07:22 Yingjoe Chen wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 15:13 +0800, Hongzhou Yang wrote:
> > From: Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang at mediatek.com>
> > The upcoming MTK pinctrl driver have a big pin table for each SoC,
> > and we don't want to bloat the kernel binary if we don't need it.
> > Add config options so we can build for one SoC only.
> > Signed-off-by: Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang at mediatek.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/Kconfig | 6 ++++++
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > index e627ead..6213dac 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > @@ -151,9 +151,15 @@ menu "Platform selection"
> > config ARCH_MEDIATEK
> > bool "Mediatek MT65xx & MT81xx ARMv8 SoC"
> > select ARM_GIC
> > + select PINCTRL
> > help
> > Support for Mediatek MT65xx & MT81xx ARMv8 SoCs
> > +config MACH_MT8173
> > + bool "Mediatek 8173 Soc Supprt"
> > + depends on ARCH_MEDIATEK
> > + default y
> > +
> > config ARCH_SEATTLE
> > bool "AMD Seattle SoC Family"
> > help
> Hi Arnd/Matthias,
> Any comments on this patch?
Actually I just commented on a similar patch from Samsung the other
day, and I think we should make a more general decision about these:
I would rather see only one Kconfig option per SoC family and use
ARCH_MEDIATEK without any MACH_* options. We can have other options
for e.g. networking chips from Mediatek that are not closely related
but I would group all the phone and tablet chips under one option
here. Same for the other vendors of course.
Any other opinions?
More information about the linux-arm-kernel