[RFC PATCH 1/3] genirq: prevent system wakeup when dealing with IRQF_NO_SUSPEND IRQs
Boris Brezillon
boris.brezillon at free-electrons.com
Tue Feb 24 01:56:00 PST 2015
Mixing IRQF_NO_SUSPEND and !IRQF_NO_SUSPEND on the same IRQ line is highly
discouraged, but in some cases (IRQ shared by a timer and other devices)
you don't have any other choice.
Since some devices sharing the IRQ line might tag it as a wakeup source,
you might end up with your handler that requested IRQF_NO_SUSPEND not
being called in suspended state, or invalid system wakeup (the system is
woken up without any wakeup source actually requesting it).
To deal with such unlikely situations, you'll have to:
1/ prevent any automatic wakeup when at least one of the IRQ users
registered with IRQF_NO_SUSPEND
2/ let IRQ users decide if/when they should wake the system up
This patch is taking care of 1.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at free-electrons.com>
---
kernel/irq/pm.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/pm.c b/kernel/irq/pm.c
index 3ca5325..1743162 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/pm.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/pm.c
@@ -16,7 +16,8 @@
bool irq_pm_check_wakeup(struct irq_desc *desc)
{
- if (irqd_is_wakeup_armed(&desc->irq_data)) {
+ if (irqd_is_wakeup_armed(&desc->irq_data) &&
+ !desc->no_suspend_depth) {
irqd_clear(&desc->irq_data, IRQD_WAKEUP_ARMED);
desc->istate |= IRQS_SUSPENDED | IRQS_PENDING;
desc->depth++;
--
1.9.1
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list