[PATCH] clockevents: Add (missing) default case for switch blocks
Ingo Molnar
mingo at kernel.org
Mon Feb 23 08:37:06 PST 2015
* Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at linaro.org> wrote:
> On 20 February 2015 at 19:34, Ingo Molnar
> <mingo at kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > * Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at linaro.org> wrote:
>
> >> Unused. Initially all clockevent devices are supposed
> >> to be in this mode but later if another device
> >> replaces an existing one, the existing one is put into
> >> this mode.
> >
> > I'd suggest to rename it to MODE_INIT - at first glance
> > it gave me the impression that it's some sort of API
> > placeholder - i.e. an unused flag or so.
>
> Sorry, if I wasn't able to clarify this earlier. The
> impression you got at first glance is correct. And it
> should be UNUSED only instead of INIT. Its not about if
> the the device is initialized or not, but if it is used
> or not. And that's why there is no callback for this in
> the new per-mode callbacks.
Ok, could we rename it to something like DETACHED?
'UNUSED' really gives me the wrong impression - it's what
we do for unused fields, unused ABI enumertion constants,
etc.
> > Also, I'd suggest to rename all 'modes' to true state
> > machine naming: STATE_INITIALIZED, STATE_SHUT_DOWN,
> > STATE_PERIODIC, STATE_RESUMED, etc.: if these are enums
> > for
>
> I thought so initially and it looked like the diff will
> be huge as all the variables for the enum, i.e. 'mode',
> need to be renamed to 'state'..
>
> But, if you are okay with it then I would be happy to do
> that..
Well, how does the diffstat look like?
But if the conversion was scripted (i.e. is relatively
secure from typos) then that's still fine IMO. Peter?
Thanks,
Ingo
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list