[PATCH RFC 2/2] ARM: pxa: transition to dmaengine phase 1
Arnd Bergmann
arnd at arndb.de
Mon Feb 16 02:28:57 PST 2015
On Saturday 14 February 2015 23:47:33 Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> @@ -294,7 +294,8 @@ int pxa_request_dma (char *name, pxa_dma_prio prio,
> /* try grabbing a DMA channel with the requested priority */
> for (i = 0; i < num_dma_channels; i++) {
> if ((dma_channels[i].prio == prio) &&
> - !dma_channels[i].name) {
> + !dma_channels[i].name &&
> + !mmp_pdma_toggle_reserved_channel(i)) {
> found = 1;
> break;
> }
>
How is the order between the two enforced? I.e. can it be that the dmaengine
driver uses the same channel for a different slave before we get here?
If this is ensured to work, I'm fine with your approach.
Arnd
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list