[PATCH] efi: get_memory_map: add sufficient slack for memory descriptors

Mark Rutland mark.rutland at arm.com
Fri Feb 13 08:34:46 PST 2015


On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 04:04:48PM +0000, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Feb, at 11:31:02PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > 
> > Actually, looking again at the original patch, it appears that my
> > analysis was incorrect regarding the possibility that the loop would
> > never terminate. The only thing that could happen if desc_size >
> > sizeof(efi_memory_desc_t) is that you need two iterations instead of
> > one to get a pool allocation that is of sufficient size.
> > So perhaps it is better to just revert the patch.
> > 
> > My apologies for the hassle.
> 
> This is what I've got queued up,

Looks sane to me:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>

Thanks,
Mark.

> 
> ---
> 
> From 3f281b98ffc99e604a3988aa93304a3a591eeeb5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming at intel.com>
> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 15:46:56 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] Revert "efi/libstub: Call get_memory_map() to obtain map and
>  desc sizes"
> 
> This reverts commit d1a8d66b9177105e898e73716f97eb61842c457a.
> 
> Ard reported a boot failure when running UEFI under Qemu and Xen and
> experimenting with various Tianocore build options,
> 
>  "As it turns out, when allocating room for the UEFI memory map using
>   UEFI's AllocatePool (), it may result in two new memory map entries
>   being created, for instance, when using Tianocore's preallocated region
>   feature. For example, the following region
> 
>   0x00005ead5000-0x00005ebfffff [Conventional Memory|   |  |  |  |  |WB|WT|WC|UC]
> 
>   may be split like this
> 
>   0x00005ead5000-0x00005eae2fff [Conventional Memory|   |  |  |  |  |WB|WT|WC|UC]
>   0x00005eae3000-0x00005eae4fff [Loader Data        |   |  |  |  |  |WB|WT|WC|UC]
>   0x00005eae5000-0x00005ebfffff [Conventional Memory|   |  |  |  |  |WB|WT|WC|UC]
> 
>   if the preallocated Loader Data region was chosen to be right in the
>   middle of the original free space.
> 
>   After patch d1a8d66b9177 ("efi/libstub: Call get_memory_map() to
>   obtain map and desc sizes"), this is not being dealt with correctly
>   anymore, as the existing logic to allocate room for a single additional
>   entry has become insufficient."
> 
> Mark requested to reinstate the old loop we had before commit
> d1a8d66b9177, which grows the memory map buffer until it's big enough to
> hold the EFI memory map.
> 
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel at linaro.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub-helper.c | 16 ++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub-helper.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub-helper.c
> index d073e3946383..9bd9fbb5bea8 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub-helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub-helper.c
> @@ -66,29 +66,25 @@ efi_status_t efi_get_memory_map(efi_system_table_t *sys_table_arg,
>  	unsigned long key;
>  	u32 desc_version;
>  
> -	*map_size = 0;
> -	*desc_size = 0;
> -	key = 0;
> -	status = efi_call_early(get_memory_map, map_size, NULL,
> -				&key, desc_size, &desc_version);
> -	if (status != EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL)
> -		return EFI_LOAD_ERROR;
> -
> +	*map_size = sizeof(*m) * 32;
> +again:
>  	/*
>  	 * Add an additional efi_memory_desc_t because we're doing an
>  	 * allocation which may be in a new descriptor region.
>  	 */
> -	*map_size += *desc_size;
> +	*map_size += sizeof(*m);
>  	status = efi_call_early(allocate_pool, EFI_LOADER_DATA,
>  				*map_size, (void **)&m);
>  	if (status != EFI_SUCCESS)
>  		goto fail;
>  
> +	*desc_size = 0;
> +	key = 0;
>  	status = efi_call_early(get_memory_map, map_size, m,
>  				&key, desc_size, &desc_version);
>  	if (status == EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL) {
>  		efi_call_early(free_pool, m);
> -		return EFI_LOAD_ERROR;
> +		goto again;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (status != EFI_SUCCESS)
> -- 
> 1.9.3
> 
> -- 
> Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
> 



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list