[PATCH RFC v9 01/20] clk: divider: Correct parent clk round rate if no bestdiv is normally found
Sascha Hauer
s.hauer at pengutronix.de
Thu Feb 12 04:24:05 PST 2015
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 06:39:45PM +0800, Liu Ying wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:33:56AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 02:01:24PM +0800, Liu Ying wrote:
> > > If no best divider is normally found, we will try to use the maximum divider.
> > > We should not set the parent clock rate to be 1Hz by force for being rounded.
> > > Instead, we should take the maximum divider as a base and calculate a correct
> > > parent clock rate for being rounded.
> >
> > Please add an explanation why you think the current code is wrong and
> > what this actually fixes, maybe an example?
>
> The MIPI DSI panel's pixel clock rate is 26.4MHz and it's derived from PLL5 on
> the MX6DL SabreSD board.
>
> These are the clock tree summaries with or without the patch applied:
> 1) With the patch applied:
> pll5_bypass_src 1 1 24000000 0 0
> pll5 1 1 844800048 0 0
> pll5_bypass 1 1 844800048 0 0
> pll5_video 1 1 844800048 0 0
> pll5_post_div 1 1 211200012 0 0
> pll5_video_div 1 1 211200012 0 0
> ipu1_di0_pre_sel 1 1 211200012 0 0
> ipu1_di0_pre 1 1 26400002 0 0
> ipu1_di0_sel 1 1 26400002 0 0
> ipu1_di0 1 1 26400002 0 0
>
> 2) Without the patch applied:
> pll5_bypass_src 1 1 24000000 0 0
> pll5 1 1 648000000 0 0
> pll5_bypass 1 1 648000000 0 0
> pll5_video 1 1 648000000 0 0
> pll5_post_div 1 1 162000000 0 0
> pll5_video_div 1 1 40500000 0 0
> ipu1_di0_pre_sel 1 1 40500000 0 0
> ipu1_di0_pre 1 1 20250000 0 0
> ipu1_di0_sel 1 1 20250000 0 0
> ipu1_di0 1 1 20250000 0 0
This seems to be broken since:
| commit b11d282dbea27db1788893115dfca8a7856bf205
| Author: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen at ti.com>
| Date: Thu Feb 13 12:03:59 2014 +0200
|
| clk: divider: fix rate calculation for fractional rates
This patch fixed a case when clk_set_rate(clk_round_rate(rate)) resulted
in a lower frequency than clk_round_rate(rate) returned.
Since then the MULT_ROUND_UP in clk_divider_bestdiv() is inconsistent to
the rest of the divider. Maybe this should be a simple rate * i now, but
I'm unsure what side effects this has.
I think your patch only fixes the behaviour in your case by accident,
it's not a correct fix for this issue.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list