[PATCH v12 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for exynos platforms

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

2015-01-08 22:17 GMT+01:00 Kevin Hilman <khilman at kernel.org>:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab at samsung.com> wrote:
>> Changes since v11:
>> - Rebased on top of git://linuxtv.org/snawrocki/samsung.git for-v3.19-exynos-clk
>>
>> This patch series removes the use of Exynos4210 and Exynos5250 specific cpufreq
>> drivers and enables the use of cpufreq-dt driver for these platforms. This
>> series also enables cpufreq support for Exynos5420 using arm_big_little cpufreq
>> driver.
>>
>> This series is based on the following branch.
>> git://linuxtv.org/snawrocki/samsung.git for-v3.19-exynos-clk
>>
>> This series depends on the following patch which can be picked from
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc.git samsung/dt
>> e540920cf21c (ARM: dts: add CPU nodes for Exynos4 SoCs).
>>
>> This patch series has been tested on Exynos4210/5250/5420 based boards.
>> Tomasz Figa had plans to take this in the Samsung clock tree for v3.19
>> (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg37933.html).
>> Sylwester, could you consider to merge this in your tree?
>
> CPUfreq for exynos is still not upstream.  What's the status of this
> series?  It's been ver a month since there's been any activity here
> (or any responses to the issues I reported.)
>
> On a related note, this series only does frequency scaling. Is there
> any work going on to also enable voltage scaling for the CPU rails as
> well?

Hi Thomas,

Do you plan to continue with this work? It would be very helpful.

I also wonder if Exynos 4412 could be re-added (without the boost if
these bindings are not ready)?

Best regards,
Krzysztof