[PATCH] doc: PCI: altera: Fix the 'ranges' property in example
Marek Vasut
marex at denx.de
Thu Dec 31 01:04:35 PST 2015
On Thursday, December 31, 2015 at 04:09:01 AM, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-12-29 at 14:33 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 at 08:48:33 AM, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2015-12-28 at 09:26 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > On Monday, December 28, 2015 at 08:42:00 AM, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
> > > > > > On Monday, December 28, 2015 at 07:56:15 AM, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
> > > > > >> On Thu, 2015-12-24 at 10:45 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > > >> > The example does not work on real hardware with the PCIe HIP
> > > > > >> > [1]. The problem is with incorrect "ranges" property in the
> > > > > >> > example, so one cannot just copy-paste the example into his
> > > > > >> > DT and expect this to work. This patches aligns the "ranges"
> > > > > >> > in the example with the reference FPGA design.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Hi Marek
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Ley,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> The original "ranges" is working for me. What error did you
> > > > > >> encounter?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Every time a driver accessed the Txs range, the system got stuck
> > > > > > hard. The Cra access always worked fine though, so the PCIe
> > > > > > devices were always detected.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I checked with signaltap and my impression is that the wrong
> > > > > > address propagated into the request passed to the Txs port of
> > > > > > the HardIP block, unless I change the range configuration.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Note that I tested Intel Centrino 6235 WiFi card and Atheros
> > > > > > AR5006 WiFi card. The intel in particular uses both the Txs and
> > > > > > even MSI , so to use the intel, the whole PCIe block has to work
> > > > > > properly ; with this change, it does and I can use the intel
> > > > > > card just fine.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Marek
> > > > >
> > > > > I tested two Ethernet adapters, one SSD NVMe and our custom
> > > > > endpoint without the problem.
> > > > > Can you please send me your dts file if possible?
> > > > >
> > > > > Do you use the latest Altera pcie driver in v4.4?
> > > >
> > > > I'm using next from 20151223, crude patch is attached.
> > >
> > > Hi Marek
> > >
> > > Your dts looks fine, same as mine; except the 'ranges' parameter. Not
> > > sure why it is not working on your side.
> > >
> > > I may try again with the linux-next later.
> >
> > Looking forward to your observations ;-)
>
> Tested with 20151223 linux-next, it is working with original dts.
Well, do you have a good explanation why the system works with this change
and doesn't work without it on my design ? I'd really love to understand
this.
> > btw the other difference is location of the Cra port, in my case it's at
> > 0xff220000 , which matches the altera reference design. The example code
> > uses 0xff240000 for whatever reason.
>
> The example code uses 0xff220000, where do you see 0xff240000?
I thought the ccb_lw_50_to_125 was at +0x40000 in the original design, but I
can't seem to be able to find that. I've been studying multiple PCIe designs
and this notion somehow crawled into my skull. Sorry, please ignore then.
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list