[PATCH v3 52/62] arm/acpi: Prepare EFI memory descriptor for Dom0
Shannon Zhao
zhaoshenglong at huawei.com
Wed Dec 30 23:40:16 PST 2015
On 2015/11/27 22:30, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, shannon.zhao at linaro.org wrote:
>> > From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao at linaro.org>
>> >
>> > Create a few EFI memory descriptors to tell Dom0 the RAM region
>> > information, ACPI table regions and EFI tables reserved resions.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Parth Dixit <parth.dixit at linaro.org>
>> > Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao at linaro.org>
>> > ---
>> > xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c | 2 ++
>> > xen/common/efi/boot.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > xen/include/asm-arm/setup.h | 4 ++++
>> > 3 files changed, 54 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
>> > index 9d667ea..073c634 100644
>> > --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
>> > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
>> > @@ -1737,6 +1737,8 @@ static int prepare_acpi(struct domain *d, struct kernel_info *kinfo)
>> > acpi_map_rest_tables(d);
>> > acpi_create_efi_system_table(d->arch.efi_acpi_gpa, d->arch.efi_acpi_table,
>> > tbl_add);
>> > + acpi_create_efi_mmap_table(d->arch.efi_acpi_gpa, d->arch.efi_acpi_table,
>> > + &kinfo->mem, tbl_add);
>> >
>> > return 0;
>> > }
>> > diff --git a/xen/common/efi/boot.c b/xen/common/efi/boot.c
>> > index 75835ae..ff2faed 100644
>> > --- a/xen/common/efi/boot.c
>> > +++ b/xen/common/efi/boot.c
>> > @@ -1256,6 +1256,54 @@ void __init acpi_create_efi_system_table(paddr_t paddr, void *efi_acpi_table,
>> > tbl_add[TBL_EFIT].start = table_addr;
>> > tbl_add[TBL_EFIT].size = table_size;
>> > }
>> > +
>> > +void __init acpi_create_efi_mmap_table(paddr_t paddr, void *efi_acpi_table,
>> > + const struct meminfo *mem,
>> > + struct membank tbl_add[])
> This function shouldn't be in this file.
>
>
>
>> > +{
>> > + EFI_MEMORY_DESCRIPTOR *memory_map;
>> > + int i, offset;
>> > + u8 *base_ptr;
>> > +
>> > + tbl_add[TBL_MMAP].start = paddr + acpi_get_table_offset(tbl_add, TBL_MMAP);
>> > + tbl_add[TBL_MMAP].size = sizeof(EFI_MEMORY_DESCRIPTOR)
>> > + * (mem->nr_banks + acpi_mem.nr_banks + TBL_MMAX);
>> > +
>> > + base_ptr = efi_acpi_table + acpi_get_table_offset(tbl_add, TBL_MMAP);
>> > + memory_map = (EFI_MEMORY_DESCRIPTOR *)(base_ptr);
>> > +
>> > + offset = 0;
>> > + for( i = 0; i < mem->nr_banks; i++, offset++ )
>> > + {
>> > + memory_map[offset].Type = EfiConventionalMemory;
>> > + memory_map[offset].PhysicalStart = mem->bank[i].start;
>> > + memory_map[offset].NumberOfPages = mem->bank[i].size/PAGE_SIZE;
> Use PAGE_SHIFT throughout the function.
>
>
>> > + memory_map[offset].Attribute = EFI_MEMORY_WB;
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > + for( i = 0; i < acpi_mem.nr_banks; i++, offset++ )
>> > + {
>> > + memory_map[offset].Type = EfiACPIReclaimMemory;
>> > + memory_map[offset].PhysicalStart = acpi_mem.bank[i].start;
>> > + memory_map[offset].NumberOfPages = acpi_mem.bank[i].size/PAGE_SIZE;
>> > + memory_map[offset].Attribute = EFI_MEMORY_WB;
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > + for( i = 0; i < TBL_EFIT; i++, offset++ )
>> > + {
>> > + memory_map[offset].Type = EfiACPIReclaimMemory;
>> > + memory_map[offset].PhysicalStart = tbl_add[i].start;
>> > + memory_map[offset].NumberOfPages =tbl_add[i].size/PAGE_SIZE;
>> > + memory_map[offset].Attribute = EFI_MEMORY_WB;
>> > + }
> Can't we just use a single EFI_MEMORY_DESCRIPTOR (or maybe 2, to cover
> EfiACPIReclaimMemory and EfiReservedMemoryType regions) to describe the
> whole efi_acpi_gpa region? Using one EFI_MEMORY_DESCRIPTOR per table,
> and PAGE_ALIGNing each of them, looks like a waste of memory to me.
> Unless it's an ACPI or EFI spec requirement.
>
Looking at the UEFI SPEC it says
"EFI memory descriptors of type EfiACPIReclaimMemory and EfiACPIMemoryNVS
must be aligned on a 4 KiB boundary and must be a multiple of 4 KiB in size"
--
Shannon
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list