[PATCH v3 2/2] dts/ls2080a: Update DTSI to add support of SP805 WDT

[Bhupesh SHARMA]

On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 7:26 AM, Shawn Guo <shawnguo at kernel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 08:41:54PM +0000, Sharma Bhupesh wrote:
>>
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Arnd Bergmann [mailto:arnd at arndb.de]
>> > Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 3:49 PM
>> > To: Bhupesh SHARMA
>> > Cc: Sharma Bhupesh-B45370; Mark Rutland; linux-arm-
>> > kernel at lists.infradead.org; Olof Johansson; devicetree at vger.kernel.org;
>> > Rob Herring; Will Deacon; Catalin Marinas; Li Yang-Leo-R58472; Wood
>> > Scott-B07421; Yoder Stuart-B08248; shawn.guo at linaro.org
>> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] dts/ls2080a: Update DTSI to add support of
>> > SP805 WDT
>> >
>> > On Wednesday 23 December 2015, Bhupesh SHARMA wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hi Arnd, Olof, Kevin
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 8:00 PM, Bhupesh Sharma
>> > > <bhupesh.sharma at freescale.com> wrote:
>> > > > This patch updates the LS2080a DTSI (DTS Include) file to add
>> > > > support for eight SP805 Watchdog units which can be used to reset
>> > > > the eight Cortex-A57 cores available on LS2080A.
>> > > >
>> > > > Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma at freescale.com>
>> > > > ---
>> > > >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls2080a.dtsi |   56
>> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > > >  1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)
>> > >
>> > > Since Rob has acked the SP805 WDT binding documentation patch (patch
>> > > 1/2 of this series),
>> > > can this DTSI change, please be considered for absorption in the arm-
>> > soc tree.
>> >
>> > Sure, please submit it for inclusion. Who is the maintainer for
>> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/ ? Can they pick up all the freescale
>> > related dts changes and submit them as a pull request? Should they go
>> > through Shawn's tree maybe?
>>
>> Thanks Arnd. For now, may-be I can send this patchset with Rob's Acked-by added
>> for 1/2 to 'arm at kernel.org'. So that this can be picked by via the arm-soc tree.
>> Shawn, I hope it's ok with you.
>
> Yeah.  I'm maintaining a git tree, collecting all Freescale arm32
> platform patches, and sending them to arm-soc for each merge window.
> If I can be copied on those arm64 patches, I do not mind handling them
> together with arm32 ones.

Thanks Shawn. Sure, I will make sure to remember the same for future
arm64 patches.

Regards,
Bhupesh