[PATCH] regulator: mt6397: convert to arch_initcall
yingjoe.chen at mediatek.com
Thu Dec 24 00:10:43 PST 2015
On Wed, 2015-12-23 at 12:00 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 06:16:08PM +0800, Henry Chen wrote:
> Please fix your mail client to word wrap within paragraphs at something
> substantially less than 80 columns. Doing this makes your messages much
> easier to read and reply to.
> > Due to some device may need reulator operation in earlier boot time like gpu module which
> > power domain need regulator power on first. Move regulator of mt6397
> > initialization earlier in boot so that real devices can use regulator
> > without probe deferring.
> Several problems here. One is that we usually use subsys_initcall() for
> working around the known broken subsystems here, why have you decided to
> go for arch_initcall() instead. Another is that you're saying this is
> for GPUs but I'm not aware of any reason why GPUs are broken and we
> should not be introducing new problems here - what's going on?
These changes are related to pinctrl init order patch. The related
discussion is here:
and these should really be a series:
mt6397 MFD core
I think Henry use arch_initcall because that's what pinctrl patch was
using. In this case, we should use subsys_initcall for all these.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel