[PATCH v7 3/4] gicv2m: Refactor to prepare for ACPI support

Bjorn Helgaas helgaas at kernel.org
Wed Dec 16 14:12:08 PST 2015

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 08:55:29AM -0800, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> This patch replaces the struct device_node with struct fwnode_handle
> since this structure is common between DT and ACPI.
> It also refactors gicv2m_init_one() to prepare for ACPI support.
> The only functional change is removing the node name from pr_info.
> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit at amd.com>

> @@ -359,10 +355,10 @@ static int __init gicv2m_init_one(struct device_node *node,
>  	}
>  	list_add_tail(&v2m->entry, &v2m_nodes);
> -	pr_info("Node %s: range[%#lx:%#lx], SPI[%d:%d]\n", node->name,
> -		(unsigned long)v2m->res.start, (unsigned long)v2m->res.end,
> -		v2m->spi_start, (v2m->spi_start + v2m->nr_spis));
> +	pr_info("range[%#lx:%#lx], SPI[%d:%d]\n",
> +		(unsigned long)res->start, (unsigned long)res->end,
> +		v2m->spi_start, (v2m->spi_start + v2m->nr_spis));

You didn't change this, but I don't think this message has enough
context.  It's pretty cryptic all by itself.  It'd be nice if it could
at least include a device name, e.g., if you could use dev_info().

If that's possible, I guess a separate patch would be appropriate,
since there are other similar things in this file.


More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list