[PATCH v2 0/6] pwm: lpc32xx: fixes in the LPC32xx PWM driver

[Thierry Reding]

On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 01:31:56PM +0200, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> The changeset fixes a number of issues within current implementation
> of LPC32xx PWM controller driver, namely
> - the SoC has two independent PWM controllers with one channel each,
> - runtime warnings from common clock framework,
> - overflow in duty cycle calculation may result in disabled PWM,
> - unsupported period values are not accepted.
> 
> Correction of PWM channels requires a correspondent change in
> arch/arm/boot/dts/lpc32xx.dtsi, it has been already sent for review.
> 
> Changes from v1 to v2:
> - corrected style of examples in documentation,
> - improved commit messages
> 
> Version v1 can be found here:
>   http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.pwm/2828
>   http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg105398.html
> 
> Vladimir Zapolskiy (6):
>   dt: lpc32xx: pwm: correct LPC32xx PWM device node example
>   dt: lpc32xx: pwm: update documentation of LPC32xx PWM device
>   pwm: lpc32xx: correct number of PWM channels from 2 to 1
>   pwm: lpc32xx: fix warnings from common clock framework
>   pwm: lpc32xx: fix and simplify duty cycle and period calculations
>   pwm: lpc32xx: return ERANGE, if requested period is not supported
> 
>  .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/lpc32xx-pwm.txt        |  9 +++-
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c                          | 59 ++++++++--------------
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

All patches applied, thanks.

Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20151216/241bf709/attachment.sig>