[PATCH v7 10/19] KVM: ARM64: Add access handler for PMCNTENSET and PMCNTENCLR register
Marc Zyngier
marc.zyngier at arm.com
Tue Dec 15 05:56:04 PST 2015
On 15/12/15 08:49, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao at linaro.org>
>
> Since the reset value of PMCNTENSET and PMCNTENCLR is UNKNOWN, use
> reset_unknown for its reset handler. Add a handler to emulate writing
> PMCNTENSET or PMCNTENCLR register.
>
> When writing to PMCNTENSET, call perf_event_enable to enable the perf
> event. When writing to PMCNTENCLR, call perf_event_disable to disable
> the perf event.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao at linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> include/kvm/arm_pmu.h | 4 ++++
> virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index dc6bb26..f216da7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -615,6 +615,39 @@ static bool access_pmu_evcntr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> return true;
> }
>
> +static inline u64 kvm_pmu_valid_counter_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + u64 val = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) >> ARMV8_PMCR_N_SHIFT;
> +
> + val &= ARMV8_PMCR_N_MASK;
> + return GENMASK(val - 1, 0) | BIT(ARMV8_CYCLE_IDX);
> +}
> +
> +static bool access_pmcntenset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> + u64 val, mask;
> +
> + mask = kvm_pmu_valid_counter_mask(vcpu);
> + if (p->is_write) {
> + val = p->regval & mask;
> + if (r->Op2 & 0x1) {
> + /* accessing PMCNTENSET_EL0 */
> + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) |= val;
> + kvm_pmu_enable_counter(vcpu, val);
> + } else {
> + /* accessing PMCNTENCLR_EL0 */
> + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) &= mask;
> + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) &= ~val;
> + kvm_pmu_disable_counter(vcpu, val);
> + }
> + } else {
> + p->regval = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) & mask;
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> /* Silly macro to expand the DBG{BCR,BVR,WVR,WCR}n_EL1 registers in one go */
> #define DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR_EL1(n) \
> /* DBGBVRn_EL1 */ \
> @@ -816,10 +849,10 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
> access_pmcr, reset_pmcr, PMCR_EL0, },
> /* PMCNTENSET_EL0 */
> { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1100), Op2(0b001),
> - trap_raz_wi },
> + access_pmcntenset, reset_unknown, PMCNTENSET_EL0 },
> /* PMCNTENCLR_EL0 */
> { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1100), Op2(0b010),
> - trap_raz_wi },
> + access_pmcntenset, NULL, PMCNTENSET_EL0 },
> /* PMOVSCLR_EL0 */
> { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1100), Op2(0b011),
> trap_raz_wi },
> @@ -1161,8 +1194,8 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc cp15_regs[] = {
>
> /* PMU */
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 0), access_pmcr },
> - { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 1), trap_raz_wi },
> - { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 2), trap_raz_wi },
> + { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 1), access_pmcntenset },
> + { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 2), access_pmcntenset },
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 3), trap_raz_wi },
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 5), access_pmselr },
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 6), access_pmceid },
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> index 14bedb0..43c4117 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> @@ -36,6 +36,8 @@ struct kvm_pmu {
> };
>
> u64 kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx);
> +void kvm_pmu_disable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val);
> +void kvm_pmu_enable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val);
> void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 data,
> u64 select_idx);
> #else
> @@ -46,6 +48,8 @@ u64 kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> +void kvm_pmu_disable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val) {}
> +void kvm_pmu_enable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val) {}
> void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 data,
> u64 select_idx) {}
> #endif
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> index b107fb8..94bff0e 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> @@ -75,6 +75,61 @@ static void kvm_pmu_stop_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
> }
>
> /**
> + * kvm_pmu_enable_counter - enable selected PMU counter
> + * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
> + * @val: the value guest writes to PMCNTENSET register
> + *
> + * Call perf_event_enable to start counting the perf event
> + */
> +void kvm_pmu_enable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val)
> +{
> + int i;
> + struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu;
> + struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
> +
> + if (!(vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) & ARMV8_PMCR_E) || !val)
> + return;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARMV8_MAX_COUNTERS; i++) {
> + if (!((val >> i) & 0x1))
> + continue;
nit: it is slightly more readable to have "if (!(val & (1 << i)))
> +
> + pmc = &pmu->pmc[i];
> + if (pmc->perf_event) {
> + perf_event_enable(pmc->perf_event);
> + if (pmc->perf_event->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE)
> + kvm_debug("fail to enable perf event\n");
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * kvm_pmu_disable_counter - disable selected PMU counter
> + * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
> + * @val: the value guest writes to PMCNTENCLR register
> + *
> + * Call perf_event_disable to stop counting the perf event
> + */
> +void kvm_pmu_disable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val)
> +{
> + int i;
> + struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu;
> + struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
> +
> + if (!val)
> + return;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARMV8_MAX_COUNTERS; i++) {
> + if (!((val >> i) & 0x1))
Same here.
> + continue;
> +
> + pmc = &pmu->pmc[i];
> + if (pmc->perf_event)
> + perf_event_disable(pmc->perf_event);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/**
> * kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type - set selected counter to monitor some event
> * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
> * @data: The data guest writes to PMXEVTYPER_EL0
>
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list