[for-4.4-rc6 PATCH] scatterlist: fix sg_phys() masking
Dan Williams
dan.j.williams at intel.com
Mon Dec 14 15:17:39 PST 2015
commit db0fa0cb0157 "scatterlist: use sg_phys()" did replacements of the
form:
phys_addr_t phys = page_to_phys(sg_page(s));
phys_addr_t phys = sg_phys(s) & PAGE_MASK;
However, this breaks platforms where sizeof(phys_addr_t) >
sizeof(unsigned long). Since PAGE_MASK is an unsigned long this
inadvertently masks the high bits returned by sg_phys(). Convert to
PHYSICAL_PAGE_MASK in these cases which will do the proper sign
extension.
As caught by the kbuild robot, a generic fallback definition of
PHYSICAL_PAGE_MASK is needed for several archs.
Cc: <stable at vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe at fb.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro at 8bytes.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
Cc: Russell King <linux at arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org>
Reported-by: Vitaly Lavrov <vel21ripn at gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams at intel.com>
---
arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 2 +-
drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 2 +-
drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_chunk_heap.c | 4 ++--
include/linux/mm.h | 12 ++++++++++++
4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
index e62400e5fb99..3eec6cbe9995 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
@@ -1521,7 +1521,7 @@ static int __map_sg_chunk(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
return -ENOMEM;
for (count = 0, s = sg; count < (size >> PAGE_SHIFT); s = sg_next(s)) {
- phys_addr_t phys = sg_phys(s) & PAGE_MASK;
+ phys_addr_t phys = sg_phys(s) & PHYSICAL_PAGE_MASK;
unsigned int len = PAGE_ALIGN(s->offset + s->length);
if (!is_coherent &&
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
index f1042daef9ad..f3bc16c5ac70 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
@@ -2159,7 +2159,7 @@ static int __domain_mapping(struct dmar_domain *domain, unsigned long iov_pfn,
sg_res = aligned_nrpages(sg->offset, sg->length);
sg->dma_address = ((dma_addr_t)iov_pfn << VTD_PAGE_SHIFT) + sg->offset;
sg->dma_length = sg->length;
- pteval = (sg_phys(sg) & PAGE_MASK) | prot;
+ pteval = (sg_phys(sg) & PHYSICAL_PAGE_MASK) | prot;
phys_pfn = pteval >> VTD_PAGE_SHIFT;
}
diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_chunk_heap.c b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_chunk_heap.c
index 195c41d7bd53..b5bb0aa26a3f 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_chunk_heap.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_chunk_heap.c
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static int ion_chunk_heap_allocate(struct ion_heap *heap,
err:
sg = table->sgl;
for (i -= 1; i >= 0; i--) {
- gen_pool_free(chunk_heap->pool, sg_phys(sg) & PAGE_MASK,
+ gen_pool_free(chunk_heap->pool, sg_phys(sg) & PHYSICAL_PAGE_MASK,
sg->length);
sg = sg_next(sg);
}
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static void ion_chunk_heap_free(struct ion_buffer *buffer)
DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
for_each_sg(table->sgl, sg, table->nents, i) {
- gen_pool_free(chunk_heap->pool, sg_phys(sg) & PAGE_MASK,
+ gen_pool_free(chunk_heap->pool, sg_phys(sg) & PHYSICAL_PAGE_MASK,
sg->length);
}
chunk_heap->allocated -= allocated_size;
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 00bad7793788..877ca73946a4 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -90,6 +90,18 @@ extern int overcommit_kbytes_handler(struct ctl_table *, int, void __user *,
/* test whether an address (unsigned long or pointer) is aligned to PAGE_SIZE */
#define PAGE_ALIGNED(addr) IS_ALIGNED((unsigned long)addr, PAGE_SIZE)
+#ifndef PHYSICAL_PAGE_MASK
+/*
+ * Cast *PAGE_MASK to a signed type so that it is sign-extended if
+ * virtual addresses are 32-bits but physical addresses are larger (ie,
+ * 32-bit PAE).
+ *
+ * An arch may redefine this to mask out values outside the max
+ * address-width of the cpu.
+ */
+#define PHYSICAL_PAGE_MASK ((signed long) PAGE_MASK)
+#endif
+
/*
* Linux kernel virtual memory manager primitives.
* The idea being to have a "virtual" mm in the same way
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list