[PATCH v2 5/5] can: flexcan: Add support for non RX-FIFO mode
Robert Schwebel
r.schwebel at pengutronix.de
Fri Dec 11 08:01:04 PST 2015
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:22:55PM +0000, Sharma Bhupesh wrote:
> > If we have to rely on the timestamps the next logical step is to add
> > sorting by timestamp to the rx-fifo implementation. I'll send a
> > patch series of the current state.
>
> With my current v3, I see no rx-frame ordering issues atleast on
> LS1021A.
Marc can post our testcases here on the list (maybe with the description
from the service request); perhaps this can clarify the issues.
> I can ask internally about more details on the "SR# 1-4074792564 : CAN
> Ordering Issues".
That would be quite helpful, thanks! Understanding the root cause of the
issue is often a good start, maybe there is an option for a software
workaround.
rsc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list