[PATCH RFC 07/27] PM / Domains: Read domain residency from DT
Ulf Hansson
ulf.hansson at linaro.org
Fri Dec 11 03:54:17 PST 2015
On 17 November 2015 at 23:37, Lina Iyer <lina.iyer at linaro.org> wrote:
> Domains that have expensive suspend resume operations, may require a
> certain amount of time be spent in an idle state to reap the power
> saving benefit. Such domains, may provide the residency requirement for
> a domain state.
>
> Read the residency for a domain state from the DT. A domain governor may
> use this information in determining the state for the domain.
>
> Cc: Axel Haslam <ahaslam at baylibre.com>
> Cc: Marc Titinger <mtitinger at baylibre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer at linaro.org>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt | 7 +++++++
Please split DT documentation into a separate patch preceding $subject
patch. Don't forget to send it to the DT maintainers as well.
> drivers/base/power/domain.c | 6 ++++++
> include/linux/pm_domain.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
> index ecfaf44..d71da29 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
> @@ -67,6 +67,13 @@ have the following properties -
> If omitted, this is assumed to be equal to:
> entry-latency-us + exit-latency-us
>
> + - residency-us:
> + Usage: Optional
> + Value type: <prop-encoded-array>
> + Definition: A u32 value representing the time for which a
> + domain must be idle in the state to reap power saving benefits
> + of entering the state.
> +
> - state-param:
> Usage: Optional
> Value type: <prop-encoded-array>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> index 9a0df09..abc81bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> @@ -1245,6 +1245,7 @@ static int genpd_alloc_states_data(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
> st[i].power_on_latency_ns;
> genpd->states[i].power_off_latency_ns =
> st[i].power_off_latency_ns;
> + genpd->states[i].residency_ns = st[i].residency_ns;
> genpd->states[i].param = st[i].param;
> }
>
> @@ -1513,6 +1514,7 @@ static int of_get_genpd_power_state(struct genpd_power_state *genpd_state,
> const struct of_device_id *match_id;
> int err = 0;
> u32 latency;
> + u32 residency;
> u32 param;
>
> match_id = of_match_node(power_state_match, state_node);
> @@ -1554,6 +1556,10 @@ static int of_get_genpd_power_state(struct genpd_power_state *genpd_state,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + err = of_property_read_u32(state_node, "residency-us", &residency);
> + if (!err)
> + genpd_state->residency_ns = 1000 * residency;
> +
> err = of_property_read_u32(state_node, "state-param", ¶m);
> if (!err)
> genpd_state->param = param;
> diff --git a/include/linux/pm_domain.h b/include/linux/pm_domain.h
> index 108a4b3..fed024a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pm_domain.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pm_domain.h
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ struct genpd_power_state {
> char *name;
> s64 power_off_latency_ns;
> s64 power_on_latency_ns;
> + s64 residency_ns;
> u32 param;
> };
>
> --
> 2.1.4
>
A general comment.
I would as step prior $subject patch, add the mechanism in genpd to
deal with this new concept of residency values. When *all* that
mechanism is in place (perhaps it needs more than one patch), then add
the DT parts.
Kind regards
Uffe
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list