Domain faults when CONFIG_CPU_SW_DOMAIN_PAN is enabled
peda at axentia.se
Thu Dec 10 10:32:30 PST 2015
Russell King wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 03:29:37PM +0000, Peter Rosin wrote:
> > Russell King wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 09:37:51PM +0000, Peter Rosin wrote:
> > > > I took both patches for a quick spin (a dozen boots and one hour
> > > > uptime after that for each patch) and no incidents. I have not
> > > > gathered data, but the crash on boot feels like it's quite a bit
> > > > above 50% when there is a problem so this feels good (I used 5
> > > > clean reboots when I bisected and that worked).
> > > >
> > > > Reported-by: Peter Rosin <peda at axentia.se>
> > > > Tested-by: Peter Rosin <peda at axentia.se>
> > > >
> > > > (and please don't forget to cc stable)
> > >
> > > I've decided to do a more in-depth fix, so that we also solve the
> > > issue that when we schedule in these down_read()s, we don't leak the
> > > permissive domain register setting into the switched-to context.
> > >
> > > Can you test this patch please? Thanks.
> > Still looking good.
> Does that mean I can add your reported and tested-by to this latest patch?
Right, I thought that was obvious, sorry for the confusion.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel