[PATCH v5 5/5] gicv2m: acpi: Introducing GICv2m ACPI support
Suravee Suthikulanit
suravee.suthikulpanit at amd.com
Wed Dec 9 10:51:31 PST 2015
On 12/9/2015 12:16 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v2m.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v2m.c
>>>> >>>[...]
>>>> >>>@@ -359,6 +368,8 @@ static int __init gicv2m_init_one(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> if (to_of_node(fwnode))
>>>> >>> name = to_of_node(fwnode)->name;
>>>> >>>+ else
>>>> >>>+ name = irq_domain_get_irqchip_fwnode_name(fwnode);
>>> >>
>>> >>Don't bother with that, the name associated with the domain is
>>> >>absolutely meaningless. You are already printing the frame address,
>>> >>which is enough to identify it, should someone need to debug this.
>>> >>
>>> >>Drop the name from the previous patch as well, and that will make one
>>> >>less difference to care about. Patch #3 can die as well.
>>> >>
>> >
>> >Ok. I'll just leave them blank (i.e. const char *name ="")
> No, just remove name altogether. Nobody reads that anyway, and if they
> want to find out, there is the address that's clear enough.
>
> Thanks,
>
> M.
Ok.
Suravee
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list