[PATCH v4 1/5] dt-bindings: add SMP enable-method for Broadcom NSP
Kapil Hali
kapilh at broadcom.com
Wed Dec 2 08:06:09 PST 2015
Hi Rob,
On 12/2/2015 8:56 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 11:24:05AM -0500, Kapil Hali wrote:
>> Add a compatible string "brcm,bcm-nsp-smp" for Broadcom's
>> Northstar Plus CPU to the 32-bit ARM CPU device tree binding
>> documentation file and create a new binding documentation for
>> Northstar Plus CPU.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kapil Hali <kapilh at broadcom.com>
>> ---
>> .../bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,nsp-cpu-method.txt | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,nsp-cpu-method.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,nsp-cpu-method.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,nsp-cpu-method.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..bf08872
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,nsp-cpu-method.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
>> +Broadcom Northstar Plus SoC CPU Enable Method
>> +---------------------------------------------
>> +This binding defines the enable method used for starting secondary
>> +CPUs in the following Broadcom SoCs:
>> + BCM58522, BCM58525, BCM58535, BCM58622, BCM58623, BCM58625, BCM88312
>> +
>> +The enable method is specified by defining the following required
>> +properties in the "cpus" device tree node:
>> + - enable-method = "brcm,bcm-nsp-smp";
>> + - secondary-boot-reg = <...>;
>
> Both of these are supposed to be per cpu core.
'enable-method' if not found in 'cpu' node is looked at in the 'cpus'
node. Except for two-three SoC families, 'enable-method' is within
'cpus' node. Is my interpretation incorrect? Did I miss anything here?
>
> Rob
>
>> +
>> +The secondary-boot-reg property is a u32 value that specifies the
>> +physical address of the register which should hold the common
>> +entry point for a secondary CPU. This entry is cpu node specific
>> +and should be added per cpu. E.g., in case of NSP (BCM58625) which
>> +is a dual core CPU SoC, this entry should be added to cpu1 node.
>> +
>> +
>> +Example:
>> + cpus {
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> + enable-method = "brcm,bcm-nsp-smp";
>> +
>> + cpu0: cpu at 0 {
>> + device_type = "cpu";
>> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a9";
>> + next-level-cache = <&L2>;
>> + reg = <0>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + cpu1: cpu at 1 {
>> + device_type = "cpu";
>> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a9";
>> + next-level-cache = <&L2>;
>> + reg = <1>;
>> + secondary-boot-reg = <0xffff042c>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt
>> index 3a07a87..d191554 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt
>> @@ -190,6 +190,7 @@ nodes to be present and contain the properties described below.
>> "allwinner,sun6i-a31"
>> "allwinner,sun8i-a23"
>> "arm,psci"
>> + "brcm,bcm-nsp-smp"
>> "brcm,brahma-b15"
>> "marvell,armada-375-smp"
>> "marvell,armada-380-smp"
>> --
>> 2.1.0
>>
>
Thanks,
Kapil
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list