[PATCH v7 3/4] arm64/arm, numa, dt: adding numa dt binding implementation for arm64 platforms.
Ganapatrao Kulkarni
gpkulkarni at gmail.com
Tue Dec 1 00:43:11 PST 2015
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong at huawei.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 2015/11/18 1:20, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
>> +static int __init early_init_parse_memory_node(unsigned long node)
>> +{
>> + const __be32 *reg, *endp;
>> + int length;
>> + int nid;
>> +
>> + const char *type = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "device_type", NULL);
>> +
>> + /* We are scanning "memory" nodes only */
>> + if (type == NULL)
>> + return 0;
>> + else if (strcmp(type, "memory") != 0)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + nid = early_init_of_get_numa_nid(node);
>> +
>> + if (nid == NUMA_NO_NODE)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + reg = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "reg", &length);
>> + endp = reg + (length / sizeof(__be32));
>> +
>> + while ((endp - reg) >= (dt_root_addr_cells + dt_root_size_cells)) {
>> + u64 base, size;
>> + struct memblock_region *mblk;
>> +
>> + base = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_addr_cells, ®);
>> + size = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_size_cells, ®);
>> + pr_debug("NUMA-DT: base = %llx , node = %u\n",
>> + base, nid);
>> +
>> + for_each_memblock(memory, mblk) {
>> + if (mblk->base == base) {
>> + if (numa_add_memblk(nid,
>> + mblk->base,
>> + mblk->size) < 0)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
>
> Maybe this is not right. If the memory spaces of NUMA nodes are
> continuous like below:
>
> memory at 60000000 {
> numa-node-id = <0x1>;
> reg = <0x0 0x60000000 0x0 0x20000000>;
> device_type = "memory";
> };
>
> memory at 40000000 {
> numa-node-id = <0x0>;
> reg = <0x0 0x40000000 0x0 0x20000000>;
> device_type = "memory";
> };
>
> There is only one memory region [0x00000040000000-0x0000007fffffff] and
> the mblk->base is 40000000, so it will not add the memory node 1.
>
> I think this should do the same thing like ACPI_NUMA but add some codes
> to check if the [base, base + size] is located in some memory region.
> Or don't check because numa_add_memblk will fail if the [base, base +
> size] is not located in some memory region.
i am not sure, this kind of mapping we can have, since memblock can only map
contiguous region to only one numa node. however i can add a check as
you suggested.
Thanks for the review!.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Shannon
>
thanks
Ganapat
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list