[PATCH] clk: at91: add audio pll clock driver
Stephen Boyd
sboyd at codeaurora.org
Thu Aug 27 11:53:10 PDT 2015
On 08/27, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre at atmel.com> wrote:
> > +
> > +static long clk_audio_pll_pad_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> > + unsigned long *parent_rate)
>
> I thought we were trying to get rid of the ->round_rate() function in
> favor of the ->determine_rate() one (which is more flexible), but maybe
> I'm wrong. Stephen, Mike, what's your opinion?
I'm not opposed to people using ->round_rate() if they want to
use it and it serves their purpose. Moving everyone to
->determine_rate() will be a long journey that has little to no
benefit for most drivers, so it's not like we need to force
everyone to use the determine rate op for new submissions so that
we can delete the round rate op one day.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list