[PATCH] soc: qcom: smd: Use correct remote processor ID

[Bjorn Andersson]

On Tue 25 Aug 13:36 PDT 2015, Andy Gross wrote:

> This patch fixes SMEM addressing issues when remote processors need to use
> secure SMEM partitions.
> 

Right, sorry for missing that remote_pid and edge_pid isn't in sync...

> Signed-off-by: Andy Gross <agross at codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd.txt      |    7 +++++++
>  drivers/soc/qcom/smd.c                             |   18 ++++++++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd.txt
> index f65c76d..3b60702 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd.txt
> @@ -37,6 +37,12 @@ The edge is described by the following properties:
>  	Definition: the identifier of the remote processor in the smd channel
>  		    allocation table
>  
> +- qcom,remote-pid:
> +	Usage: required

I would like to see this being optional, as this is not a property that
matters on any of the 32-bit systems (perhaps 8084?).

> +	Value type: <u32>
> +	Definition: the identifier for the remote processor as known by the rest
> +		    of the system.
> +
>  = SMD DEVICES
>  
>  In turn, subnodes of the "edges" represent devices tied to SMD channels on that
> @@ -68,6 +74,7 @@ The following example represents a smd node, with one edge representing the
>  			interrupts = <0 168 1>;
>  			qcom,ipc = <&apcs 8 0>;
>  			qcom,smd-edge = <15>;
> +			qcom,remote-pid = <0xffffffff>;

This looks messy, so let's make the property optional and make its
absence indicate the "global partition".

>  
>  			rpm_requests {
>  				compatible = "qcom,rpm-msm8974";
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/smd.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/smd.c
[..]
> @@ -1184,6 +1187,13 @@ static int qcom_smd_parse_edge(struct device *dev,
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> +	key = "qcom,remote-pid";
> +	ret = of_property_read_u32(node, key, &edge->remote_pid);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "edge missing %s property\n", key);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +

So I suggest you changing this to:

edge->remote_pid = QCOM_SMEM_HOST_ANY;
of_property_read_u32(node, "qcom,remote-pid", &edge->remote_pid);

>  	syscon_np = of_parse_phandle(node, "qcom,ipc", 0);
>  	if (!syscon_np) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "no qcom,ipc node\n");

Regards,
Bjorn