[BUG] arm: kgdb: patch_text() in kgdb_arch_set_breakpoint() may sleep
Doug Anderson
dianders at chromium.org
Tue Aug 25 15:06:02 PDT 2015
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Doug Anderson <dianders at chromium.org> wrote:
>> Perhaps we need to test if we're already atomic in patch_text, and
>> only call stop_machine if we need to?
>>
>> Untested (and likely mangled by gmail):
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/patch.c b/arch/arm/kernel/patch.c
>> index 69bda1a5707e..855696bfe072 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/patch.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/patch.c
>> @@ -124,5 +124,8 @@ void __kprobes patch_text(void *addr, unsigned int insn)
>> .insn = insn,
>> };
>>
>> - stop_machine(patch_text_stop_machine, &patch, NULL);
>> + if (unlikely(in_atomic_preempt_off()))
>> + patch_text_stop_machine(&patch);
>> + else
>> + stop_machine(patch_text_stop_machine, &patch, NULL);
>
> Ah, right. We're already stopped, so just not stopping again seems
> reasonable. I think I'd rather just use in_dbg_master() as the test
> since that's a case where I _know_ all the CPUs are stopped. Doesn't
> in_atomic_preempt_off() just check if preemption is off for this
> single CPU?
>
> Anyway, I'll throw a patch up now. It fixes it for me. :)
In case anyone happens upon this thread, the patch I originally put up
is at <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7067211/>. ...I've since
spun it to <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7073441/>
-Doug
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list