[RFC PATCH v6 1/9] mmc: dw_mmc: Add external dma interface support
Shawn Lin
shawn.lin at rock-chips.com
Fri Aug 21 00:27:43 PDT 2015
On 2015/8/21 14:35, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> On 08/21/2015 03:30 PM, Shawn Lin wrote:
>> On 2015/8/21 14:27, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
>>> Hi, Shawn.
>>>
>>> Is this based on Ulf's repository?
>>
>>
>> no, it's based on "https://github.com/jh80chung/dw-mmc.git tags/dw-mmc-for-ulf-v4.2" :)
>
> Oh..I will rebase to Ulf's next branch on this weekend.
> Then could you rebase this patch? And i added more comments at below.. :)
>
Okay, I will rebase to Ulf's next.
> Best Regards,
> Jaehoon Chung
>
>>
[...]
>>>> index ec6dbcd..7e1d13b 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-pltfm.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-pltfm.c
>>>> @@ -59,6 +59,8 @@ int dw_mci_pltfm_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>>> host->pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
>>>>
>>>> regs = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>>>> + /* Get registers' physical base address */
>>>> + host->phy_regs = (void *)(regs->start);
>>>> host->regs = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, regs);
>>>> if (IS_ERR(host->regs))
>>>> return PTR_ERR(host->regs);
>>>
>>> Is this board specific code? If so, separate the patch.
It's might not board specific code.
dmaengine need dw_mmc's *physical* fifo address for data transfer, so I
get controller physical address here in order to calculate physical
fifo address.
regs is from dt-bindings, for instance:
dwmmc0 at 12200000 {
compatible = "snps,dw-mshc";
clocks = <&clock 351>, <&clock 132>;
clock-names = "biu", "ciu";
reg = <0x12200000 0x1000>;
interrupts = <0 75 0>;
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
};
so, host->phy_regs will be 0x12200000 .
[...]
>>>> +static void dw_mci_dmac_complete_dma(void *arg)
>>>> {
>>>> + struct dw_mci *host = arg;
>>>> struct mmc_data *data = host->data;
>>>>
>>>> dev_vdbg(host->dev, "DMA complete\n");
>>>>
>>>> + if (host->use_dma == TRANS_MODE_EDMAC)
>>>> + if (data && (data->flags & MMC_DATA_READ))
>>>
>>> Combine one condition.
okay.
[...]
>>>> + u32 fifo_offset = host->fifo_reg - host->regs;
>>>> + int ret = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Set external dma config: burst size, burst width */
>>>> + cfg.dst_addr = (dma_addr_t)(host->phy_regs + fifo_offset);
>>>
>>> host->phy_regs is not assigned?
we got it at dw_mci_pltfm_register. See comments above. :)
[...]
>>>> mmc->max_blk_count = mmc->max_req_size / 512;
>>>> + } else if (host->use_dma == TRANS_MODE_EDMAC) {
>>>> + mmc->max_segs = 64;
>>>> + mmc->max_blk_size = 65536;
>>>> + mmc->max_blk_count = 65535;
>>>> + mmc->max_req_size =
>>>> + mmc->max_blk_size * mmc->max_blk_count;
>>>> + mmc->max_seg_size = mmc->max_req_size;
>>>
>>> Fix the indention
Hmm..I check it attentively but can't find the indention . Might it's
because you apply it against Ulf's repo?
>>>
[...]
>>>>
>>>> - /* Alloc memory for sg translation */
>>>> - host->sg_cpu = dmam_alloc_coherent(host->dev, PAGE_SIZE,
>>>> - &host->sg_dma, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> - if (!host->sg_cpu) {
>>>> - dev_err(host->dev, "%s: could not alloc DMA memory\n",
>>>> - __func__);
>>>> + /* Check tansfer mode */
>>>> + trans_mode = SDMMC_GET_TRANS_MODE(mci_readl(host, HCON));
>>>> + if (trans_mode == 0) {
>>>> + trans_mode = TRANS_MODE_IDMAC;
>>>> + } else if (trans_mode == 1 || trans_mode == 2) {
>>>> + trans_mode = TRANS_MODE_EDMAC;
>>>> + } else {
>>>> + trans_mode = TRANS_MODE_PIO;
>>>
>>> what are trans_mode "0, 1, 2"?
>>> (00 - none) is NO-DMA interface, isn't? is it IDMAC mode?
>>>
No, I guess the databook's ambiguous description confuse everybody.
I got double comfirm from my ASCI team as well as Synoposys
2b'00: NO-DMA interface --> It support IDMAC actually
2b'01 & 2b'02: DW_DMA & GENERIC_DMA --> Support 2 types of external dma.
2b'02: NON-DW-DMA --> only support PIO
refer to the description below:
Parameter Name: DMA_INTERFACE
Legal Values: 0-3
Default Value: 0
Description:
0- No DMA Interface
1- DesignWare DMA Interface
2- Generic DMA Interface
3- Non DW DMA Interface
In DesignWare DMA mode, request/acknowledge protocol meets DW_ahb_dmac
controller protocol. In this mode, host data bus is also used for DMA
transfers.Generic DMA-type interface has simpler request/acknowledge
handshake and has dedicated read/write data bus for DMA transfers. Non
DW DMAC interface uses dw_dma_single interface in addition to the
existing interface and uses host data bus for DMA transfers. This is
configurable only if INTERNAL_DMAC=0.
>>>> goto no_dma;
>>>> }
>
>>>> + dev_info(host->dev, "Using external DMA controller.\n");
>>>> + }
>>>>
>>>> if (!host->dma_ops)
>>>> goto no_dma;
>>>> @@ -2562,12 +2720,12 @@ static void dw_mci_init_dma(struct dw_mci *host)
>>>> goto no_dma;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> - host->use_dma = 1;
>>>> + host->use_dma = trans_mode;
>>>
>>> Also confuse, if trans_mode is assigned host->use_dma, can mode value be directly assigned to host->use_dma?
>>>
Good idea, I will do it. :)
>>> trans_mode = TRAMS_MODE_PIO;
>>> host->use_dma = trans_mode;
>>>
[...]
>>>>
>>>> @@ -2890,7 +3047,7 @@ int dw_mci_probe(struct dw_mci *host)
>>>> * Get the host data width - this assumes that HCON has been set with
>>>> * the correct values.
>>>> */
>>>> - i = (mci_readl(host, HCON) >> 7) & 0x7;
>>>> + i = SDMMC_GET_HDATA_WIDTH(mci_readl(host, HCON));
>>>
>>> This is not related with supporting external dma interface.
>>> Separate this.
>>>
Okay, It will be split into another one.
>>>> if (!i) {
>>>> host->push_data = dw_mci_push_data16;
>>>> host->pull_data = dw_mci_pull_data16;
--
Best Regards
Shawn Lin
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list