[4.1.3-rt3] [report][suspend to ram] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:917
Grygorii Strashko
grygorii.strashko at ti.com
Mon Aug 17 08:46:36 PDT 2015
Hi Sebastian,
On 08/16/2015 02:42 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> * Grygorii Strashko | 2015-08-12 21:25:50 [+0300]:
>>
>> I can constantly see below error report with RT-kernel on TI ARM dra7-evm
>> if I'm trying to do Suspend to RAM.
>
> do you see the same problem on x86 with -RT?
Unfortunately, I'm not working with x86 now, and I'm not sure I'll be able
to try it in the nearest future.
Below, I've tried to analyze involved code path and it seems expected
to call clear_tasks_mm_cpumask() in atomic context, as the whole
take_cpu_down() call chain expected to be atomic.
>
>> Disabling non-boot CPUs ...
>> PM: noirq suspend of devices complete after 7.295 msecs
>> [ 100.285729] Disabling non-boot CPUs ...
>> [ 100.287575] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:917
>> [ 100.287580] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 128, pid: 18, name: migration/1
>> [ 100.287583] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
>> [ 100.287586] irq event stamp: 122
>> [ 100.287600] hardirqs last enabled at (121): [<c06ac0ac>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x88/0x90
>> [ 100.287609] hardirqs last disabled at (122): [<c06abed0>] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x28/0x5c
>> [ 100.287620] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<c003d294>] copy_process.part.52+0x410/0x19d8
>> [ 100.287625] softirqs last disabled at (0): [< (null)>] (null)
>> [ 100.287630] Preemption disabled at:[< (null)>] (null)
>> [ 100.287631]
>> [ 100.287639] CPU: 1 PID: 18 Comm: migration/1 Tainted: G W 4.1.4-rt3-01046-g96ac8da #204
>> [ 100.287642] Hardware name: Generic DRA74X (Flattened Device Tree)
>> [ 100.287659] [<c0019134>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0014774>] (show_stack+0x20/0x24)
>> [ 100.287671] [<c0014774>] (show_stack) from [<c06a70f4>] (dump_stack+0x88/0xdc)
>> [ 100.287681] [<c06a70f4>] (dump_stack) from [<c006cab8>] (___might_sleep+0x198/0x2a8)
>> [ 100.287689] [<c006cab8>] (___might_sleep) from [<c06ac4dc>] (rt_spin_lock+0x30/0x70)
>> [ 100.287699] [<c06ac4dc>] (rt_spin_lock) from [<c013f790>] (find_lock_task_mm+0x9c/0x174)
>
> this is task_lock() which takes a sleeping lock.
>
>> [ 100.287710] [<c013f790>] (find_lock_task_mm) from [<c00409ac>] (clear_tasks_mm_cpumask+0xb4/0x1ac)
>> [ 100.287720] [<c00409ac>] (clear_tasks_mm_cpumask) from [<c00166a4>] (__cpu_disable+0x98/0xbc)
>> [ 100.287728] [<c00166a4>] (__cpu_disable) from [<c06a2e8c>] (take_cpu_down+0x1c/0x50)
>> [ 100.287742] [<c06a2e8c>] (take_cpu_down) from [<c00f2600>] (multi_cpu_stop+0x11c/0x158)
>> [ 100.287754] [<c00f2600>] (multi_cpu_stop) from [<c00f2a9c>] (cpu_stopper_thread+0xc4/0x184)
>
> this function contains local_save_flags().
multi_cpu_stop:
local_save_flags(flags);
if (!msdata->active_cpus)
is_active = cpu == cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
else
is_active = cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, msdata->active_cpus);
/* Simple state machine */
do {
/* Chill out and ensure we re-read multi_stop_state. */
cpu_relax();
if (msdata->state != curstate) {
curstate = msdata->state;
switch (curstate) {
case MULTI_STOP_DISABLE_IRQ:
local_irq_disable();
hard_irq_disable(); <==== Step 2 disable IRQs
break;
case MULTI_STOP_RUN:
if (is_active)
err = msdata->fn(msdata->data); ===> Step 3 take_cpu_down()
break;
default:
break;
}
ack_state(msdata);
}
} while (curstate != MULTI_STOP_EXIT);
local_irq_restore(flags);
>
>> [ 100.287767] [<c00f2a9c>] (cpu_stopper_thread) from [<c0069058>] (smpboot_thread_fn+0x18c/0x324)
cpu_stopper_thread:
preempt_disable();
ret = fn(arg); ===> multi_cpu_stop()
if (ret)
done->ret = ret;
preempt_enable();
>> [ 100.287779] [<c0069058>] (smpboot_thread_fn) from [<c00649c4>] (kthread+0xe8/0x104)
>> [ 100.287791] [<c00649c4>] (kthread) from [<c0010058>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x3c)
>> [ 100.288114] CPU1: shutdown
>
> The local_save_flags() should be probably replaced with something else.
>
Below is list of clear_tasks_mm_cpumask() users:
arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
int __cpu_disable(void)
216: clear_tasks_mm_cpumask(cpu);
arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
int __cpu_disable(void)
238: clear_tasks_mm_cpumask(cpu);
arch/metag/kernel/smp.c
int __cpu_disable(void)
290: clear_tasks_mm_cpumask(cpu);
arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_nohash.c
_cpu_down()
+ cpu_notify_nofail(CPU_DEAD | mod, hcpu);
+ mmu_context_cpu_notify()
400: clear_tasks_mm_cpumask(cpu);
arch/sh/kernel/smp.c
int __cpu_disable(void)
155: clear_tasks_mm_cpumask(cpu);
arch/xtensa/kernel/smp.c
int __cpu_disable(void)
279: clear_tasks_mm_cpumask(cpu);
As per above, in all case, except *powerpc*, the clear_tasks_mm_cpumask()
is called from __cpu_disable() (atomic context).
While in powerpc case it's called from _cpu_down() (if I understand right,
in non-atomic context).
Commit which adds clear_tasks_mm_cpumask() call for arm is below:
commit 3eaa73bde2fb475b731a0fde7dd11c3ecfb8679c
Author: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov at linaro.org>
Date: Thu May 31 16:26:22 2012 -0700
arm: use clear_tasks_mm_cpumask()
Checking for process->mm is not enough because process' main thread may
exit or detach its mm via use_mm(), but other threads may still have a
valid mm.
To fix this we would need to use find_lock_task_mm(), which would walk up
all threads and returns an appropriate task (with task lock held).
clear_tasks_mm_cpumask() has this issue fixed, so let's use it.
Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg at redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov at linaro.org>
Cc: Russell King <rmk at arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds at linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
index b735521..2c7217d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
@@ -109,7 +109,6 @@ static void percpu_timer_stop(void);
int __cpu_disable(void)
{
unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
- struct task_struct *p;
int ret;
ret = platform_cpu_disable(cpu);
@@ -139,12 +138,7 @@ int __cpu_disable(void)
flush_cache_all();
local_flush_tlb_all();
- read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
- for_each_process(p) {
- if (p->mm)
- cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(p->mm));
- }
- read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+ clear_tasks_mm_cpumask(cpu);
return 0;
}
Thanks for your reply.
--
regards,
-grygorii
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list