[PATCH 1/5] ACPI: add in a bad_madt_entry() function to eventually replace the macro
Hanjun Guo
hanjun.guo at linaro.org
Thu Aug 13 02:28:41 PDT 2015
On 08/07/2015 04:59 AM, Al Stone wrote:
> The existing BAD_MADT_ENTRY macro only checks that the size of the data
> structure for an MADT subtable matches the length entry in the subtable.
> This is, unfortunately, not reliable. Nor, as it turns out, does it have
> anything to do with what the length should be in any particular table.
>
> We introduce the bad_madt_entry() function that uses a data set to
> do some basic sanity checks on any given MADT subtable. Over time, as
> the spec changes, we should just be able to add entries to the data set
> to reflect the changes.
>
> What the data set captures is the allowed MADT subtable length for each
> type of subtable, for each revision of the specification. While there
> is a revision number in the MADT that we should be able to use to figure
> out the proper subtable length, it was not changed when subtables did.
> And, while there is a major and minor revision in the FADT that could
> also help, it was not always changed as the subtables changed either.
> So, the data set captures for each published version of the ACPI spec
> what the FADT revisions numbers should be, the corresponding MADT
> revision number, and the subtable types and lengths that were defined
> at that time.
>
> The sanity checks done are:
> -- is the length non-zero?
> -- is the subtable type defined/allowed for the revision of
> the FADT we're using?
> -- is the subtable type defined/allowed for the revision of
> the MADT we're using?
> -- is the length entry what it should be for this revision
> of the MADT and FADT?
>
> These checks are more thorough than the previous macro provided, and
> are now insulated from data structure size changes by ACPICA, which
> have been the source of other patches in the past.
>
> Now that the bad_madt_entry() function is available, we add code to
> also invoke it before any subtable handlers are called to use the
> info in the subtable. Subsequent patches will remove the use of the
> BAD_MADT_ENTRY macro which is now redundant as a result. Any ACPI
> functions that use acpi_parse_madt_entries() will always have all of
> the MADT subtables checked from now on.
>
> Signed-off-by: Al Stone <al.stone at linaro.org>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw at rjwysocki.net>
> Cc: Len Brown <lenb at kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/tables.c | 241 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 241 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/tables.c b/drivers/acpi/tables.c
> index 2e19189..abd7a72 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/tables.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/tables.c
> @@ -214,6 +214,245 @@ void acpi_table_print_madt_entry(struct acpi_subtable_header *header)
> }
> }
>
> +/*
> + * The Long, Sad, True Story of the MADT
> + * or
> + * What does bad_madt_entry() actually do?
> + *
> + * Once upon a time in ACPI 1.0, there was the MADT. It was a nice table,
> + * and it had two subtables all of its own. But, it was also a pretty
> + * busy table, too, so over time the MADT gathered up other nice little
> + * subtables. By the time ACPI 6.0 came around, the MADT had 16 of the
> + * little guys.
> + *
> + * Now, the MADT kept a little counter around for the subtables. In fact,
> + * it kept two counters: one was the revision level, which was supposed to
> + * change when new subtables came to be, or as the ones already around grew
> + * up. The second counter was a type number, because the MADT needed a unique
> + * type for each subtable so he could tell them apart. But, sometimes the
> + * MADT got so busy, he forgot to increment the revision level when he needed
> + * to. Fortunately, the type counter kept increasing since that's the only
> + * way the MADT could find each little subtable. It just wouldn't do to have
> + * every subtable called Number 6.
> + *
> + * In the next valley over, a castle full of wizards was watching the MADT
> + * and made a pact to keep their own counter. Every time the MADT found a
> + * new subtable, or a subtable grew up, the wizards promised they would
> + * increment their counter. Well, wizards being the forgetful sort, they
> + * didn't alway do that. And, since there quite a lot of them, they
> + * couldn't always remember who was supposed to keep track of the MADT,
> + * especially if dinner was coming up soon. Their counter was called the
> + * spec version.
> + *
> + * Every now and then, the MADT would gather up all its little subtables
> + * and take them in to the cobbler to get new boots. This was a very, very
> + * meticulous cobbler, so every time they came, he wrote down all the boot
> + * sizes for all of the little subtables. The cobbler would ask each subtable
> + * for its length, check that against his careful notes, and then go get the
> + * right boots. Sometimes, a little subtable would change a bit, and their
> + * length did not match what the cobbler had written down. If the wizards
> + * or the MADT had incremented their counters, the cobbler would breath a
> + * sigh of relief and write down the new length as the right one. But, if
> + * none of the counters had changed, this would make the cobbler very, very
> + * mad. He couldn't tell if he had the right size boots or not for the
> + * little subtable. He would have to *guess* and this really bugged him.
> + *
> + * Well, when the cobbler got mad like this, he would go into hiding. He
> + * would not make or sell any boots. He would not go out at all. Pretty
> + * soon, the coffee shop would have to close because the cobbler wasn't
> + * coming by twice a day any more. Then the grocery store would have to
> + * close because he wouldn't eat much. After a while, everyone would panic
> + * and have to move from the village and go live with all their relatives
> + * (usually the ones they didn't like very much).
> + *
> + * Eventually, the cobbler would work his way out of his bad mood, and
> + * open up his boot business again. Then, everyone else could move back
> + * to the village and restart their lives, too.
> + *
> + * Fortunately, we have been able to collect up all the cobbler's careful
> + * notes (and we wrote them down below). We'll have to keep checking these
> + * notes over time, too, just as the cobbler does. But, in the meantime,
> + * we can avoid the panic and the reboot since we can make sure that each
> + * subtable is doing okay. And that's what bad_madt_entry() does.
> + *
> + *
> + * FADT Major Version -> 1 3 4 4 5 5 6
> + * FADT Minor Version -> x x x x x 1 0
> + * MADT revision -> 1 1 2 3 3 3 3
> + * Spec Version -> 1.0 2.0 3.0b 4.0a 5.0b 5.1a 6.0
> + * Subtable Name Type Expected Length ->
> + * Processor Local APIC 0x0 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
> + * IO APIC 0x1 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
> + * Int Src Override 0x2 10 10 10 10 10 10
> + * NMI Src 0x3 8 8 8 8 8 8
> + * Local APIC NMI Struct 0x4 6 6 6 6 6 6
> + * Local APIC Addr Ovrrd 0x5 16 12 12 12 12 12
> + * IO SAPIC 0x6 20 16 16 16 16 16
> + * Local SAPIC 0x7 8 >16 >16 >16 >16 >16
> + * Platform Int Src 0x8 16 16 16 16 16 16
> + * Proc Local x2APIC 0x9 16 16 16 16
> + * Local x2APIC NMI 0xa 12 12 12 12
> + * GICC CPU I/F 0xb 40 76 80
> + * GICD 0xc 24 24 24
> + * GICv2m MSI 0xd 24 24
> + * GICR 0xe 16 16
> + * GIC ITS 0xf 16
> + *
> + * In the table, each length entry is what should be in the length
> + * field of the subtable, and -- in general -- it should match the
> + * size of the struct for the subtable. Any value that is not set
> + * (i.e., is zero) indicates that the subtable is not defined for
> + * that version of the ACPI spec.
> + *
> + */
> +#define SUBTABLE_UNDEFINED 0x00
> +#define SUBTABLE_VARIABLE 0xff
> +#define NUM_SUBTABLE_TYPES 16
> +
> +struct acpi_madt_subtable_lengths {
> + unsigned short major_version; /* from revision in FADT header */
> + unsigned short minor_version; /* FADT field starting with 5.1 */
> + unsigned short madt_version; /* MADT revision */
> + unsigned short num_types; /* types possible for this version */
> + unsigned short lengths[NUM_SUBTABLE_TYPES];
> + /* subtable lengths, indexed by type */
> +};
> +
> +static struct acpi_madt_subtable_lengths spec_info[] = {
> + { /* for ACPI 1.0 */
> + .major_version = 1,
> + .minor_version = 0,
> + .madt_version = 1,
> + .num_types = 2,
> + .lengths = { 8, 12 }
> + },
> + { /* for ACPI 2.0 */
> + .major_version = 3,
> + .minor_version = 0,
> + .madt_version = 1,
> + .num_types = 9,
> + .lengths = { 8, 12, 10, 8, 6, 16, 20, 8, 16 }
> + },
> + { /* for ACPI 3.0b */
> + .major_version = 4,
> + .minor_version = 0,
> + .madt_version = 2,
> + .num_types = 9,
> + .lengths = { 8, 12, 10, 8, 6, 12, 16, SUBTABLE_VARIABLE, 16 }
> + },
> + { /* for ACPI 4.0a */
> + .major_version = 4,
> + .minor_version = 0,
> + .madt_version = 3,
> + .num_types = 11,
> + .lengths = { 8, 12, 10, 8, 6, 12, 16, SUBTABLE_VARIABLE,
> + 16, 16, 12 }
> + },
> + { /* for ACPI 5.0b */
> + .major_version = 5,
> + .minor_version = 0,
> + .madt_version = 3,
> + .num_types = 13,
> + .lengths = { 8, 12, 10, 8, 6, 12, 16, SUBTABLE_VARIABLE,
> + 16, 16, 12, 40, 24 }
> + },
> + { /* for ACPI 5.1a */
> + .major_version = 5,
> + .minor_version = 1,
> + .madt_version = 3,
> + .num_types = 15,
> + .lengths = { 8, 12, 10, 8, 6, 12, 16, SUBTABLE_VARIABLE,
> + 16, 16, 12, 76, 24, 24, 16 }
> + },
> + { /* for ACPI 6.0 */
> + .major_version = 6,
> + .minor_version = 0,
> + .madt_version = 3,
> + .num_types = 16,
> + .lengths = { 8, 12, 10, 8, 6, 12, 16, SUBTABLE_VARIABLE,
> + 16, 16, 12, 80, 24, 24, 16, 16 }
> + },
> + { /* terminator */
> + .major_version = 0,
> + .minor_version = 0,
> + .madt_version = 0,
> + .num_types = 0,
> + .lengths = { 0 }
> + }
> +};
> +
> +int __init bad_madt_entry(struct acpi_table_header *table,
static?
> + struct acpi_subtable_header *entry)
> +{
> + struct acpi_madt_subtable_lengths *ms;
> + struct acpi_table_madt *madt;
> + unsigned short major;
> + unsigned short minor;
> + unsigned short len;
> +
> + /* simple sanity checking on MADT subtable entries */
> + if (!entry || !table)
> + return 1;
This function is defined as int, so just return some
error numbers? or
bool __init bad_madt_entry()...
> +
> + /* FADT minor numbers were not introduced until ACPI 5.1 */
> + major = acpi_gbl_FADT.header.revision;
> + if (major >= 5 && acpi_gbl_FADT.header.length >= 268)
> + minor = acpi_gbl_FADT.minor_revision;
> + else
> + minor = 0;
> +
> + madt = (struct acpi_table_madt *)table;
> + ms = spec_info;
> + while (ms->num_types != 0) {
> + if (ms->major_version == major &&
> + ms->minor_version == minor &&
> + ms->madt_version == madt->header.revision)
> + break;
> + ms++;
> + }
> + if (!ms) {
seems ms will never be NULL, as it will point to one entry
in spec_info.
Thanks
Hanjun
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list