[PATCH v5 5/5] KVM: eventfd: add irq bypass consumer management
Alex Williamson
alex.williamson at redhat.com
Wed Aug 12 12:05:07 PDT 2015
On Mon, 2015-08-10 at 15:31 +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> This patch adds the registration/unregistration of an
> irq_bypass_consumer on irqfd assignment/deassignment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger at linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu at intel.com>
>
> ---
>
> v4 -> v5:
> - due to removal of static inline stubs, add
> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQ_BYPASS
> around consumer registration/unregistration
> - add pr_info when registration fails
>
> v2 -> v3 (Feng Wu):
> - Use kvm_arch_irq_bypass_start
> - Remove kvm_arch_irq_bypass_update
> - Add member 'struct irq_bypass_producer *producer' in
> 'struct kvm_kernel_irqfd', it is needed by posted interrupt.
> - Remove 'irq_bypass_unregister_consumer' in kvm_irqfd_deassign()
>
> v1 -> v2:
> - populate of kvm and gsi removed
> - unregister the consumer on irqfd_shutdown
> ---
> include/linux/kvm_irqfd.h | 2 ++
> virt/kvm/eventfd.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_irqfd.h b/include/linux/kvm_irqfd.h
> index f926b39..0c1de05 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_irqfd.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_irqfd.h
> @@ -64,6 +64,8 @@ struct kvm_kernel_irqfd {
> struct list_head list;
> poll_table pt;
> struct work_struct shutdown;
> + struct irq_bypass_consumer consumer;
> + struct irq_bypass_producer *producer;
> };
>
> #endif /* __LINUX_KVM_IRQFD_H */
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
> index 647ffb8..d7a230f 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
> #include <linux/srcu.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/seqlock.h>
> +#include <linux/irqbypass.h>
> #include <trace/events/kvm.h>
>
> #include <kvm/iodev.h>
> @@ -140,6 +141,9 @@ irqfd_shutdown(struct work_struct *work)
> /*
> * It is now safe to release the object's resources
> */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQ_BYPASS
> + irq_bypass_unregister_consumer(&irqfd->consumer);
> +#endif
> eventfd_ctx_put(irqfd->eventfd);
> kfree(irqfd);
> }
> @@ -379,6 +383,17 @@ kvm_irqfd_assign(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_irqfd *args)
> * we might race against the POLLHUP
> */
> fdput(f);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQ_BYPASS
> + irqfd->consumer.token = (void *)irqfd->eventfd;
> + irqfd->consumer.add_producer = kvm_arch_irq_bypass_add_producer;
> + irqfd->consumer.del_producer = kvm_arch_irq_bypass_del_producer;
> + irqfd->consumer.stop = kvm_arch_irq_bypass_stop;
> + irqfd->consumer.start = kvm_arch_irq_bypass_start;
> + ret = irq_bypass_register_consumer(&irqfd->consumer);
> + if (ret)
> + pr_info("irq bypass consumer (token %p) registration fails: %d\n",
> + irqfd->consumer.token, ret);
> +#endif
Does this series compile on its own? Aren't all these arch function
unresolved?
>
> return 0;
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list