arm kernel oops in highmem.c with 4.2
Nicolas Pitre
nico at fluxnic.net
Tue Aug 11 19:18:26 PDT 2015
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015, Mark Salter wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 16:20 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Aug 2015, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> >
> > > It needs fixing or removing.
> >
> > Absolutely. I'm not disputing that. I'm only asking so we can wisely
> > choose between fixing or removing. Personally I'd be inclined towards
> > the later, unless the following is sufficient to fix it:
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/uaccess_with_memcpy.c
> > b/arch/arm/lib/uaccess_with_memcpy.c
> > index 3e58d71001..4b39af2dfd 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/lib/uaccess_with_memcpy.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/lib/uaccess_with_memcpy.c
> > @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ __copy_to_user_memcpy(void __user *to, const void
> > *from, unsigned long n)
> > }
> >
> > /* the mmap semaphore is taken only if not in an atomic context
> > */
> > - atomic = in_atomic();
> > + atomic = faulthandler_disabled();
> >
> > if (!atomic)
> > down_read(¤t->mm->mmap_sem);
>
> Yeah, that fixes the problem I was seeing.
Good! Then I'll add it to RMK's patch system. May I add a tested-by
tag with your name?
> This was on a calxeda highbank.
Any idea why this option was set?
> With CONFIG_UACCESS_WITH_MEMCPY, the dd copy test reported 1.8GB/s
> Without CONFIG_UACCESS_WITH_MEMCPY, 2.1GB/s
Therefore this is of no benefit to you.
Nicolas
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list