[PATCH] ARM: OMAP: irqdomain_hierarchy: fix arm gic irq type configuration

Marc Zyngier marc.zyngier at arm.com
Tue Aug 11 04:24:56 PDT 2015


On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 10:25:47 +0100
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko at ti.com> wrote:

Hi Grygorii,

> It's observed that ARM GIC IRQ triggering type is not configured
> properly when IRQ is routed through IRQ domains hierarchy and
> system started using DT. As result, system will start using default
> ARM GIC configuration, ignore DT IRQ type configuration,
> and value of desc->irq_data.state_use_accessors = 0.
> 
> In case of TI OMAP the following IRQ hierarchy is defined:
> ARM GIC <- OMAP wakeupgen <- TI CBAR
> 
> Failed call chain:
>  irq_create_of_mapping
>  irq_set_irq_type
>  __irq_set_trigger
>  if (!chip || !chip->irq_set_type) {
>     return 0; <- return here
>  }
>  CBAR has no .irq_set_type() defined and, so, IRQ triggering
>  configuration will not be propagated to parent IRQ domain.
> 
> Hence, fix it by introducing irq_chip_set_type_parent(), in the
> same manner as irq_chip_set_wake_parent(), and use it for IRQ 
> triggering type propagation to the parent IRQ domain in
> irq-crossbar and omap-wakeupgen.
> 
> / # cat /proc/interrupts -- before
> 230:          0          0      CBAR  30 Edge    -00000000  48051000.gpio
> 263:          0          0      CBAR 116 Edge    -00000000  48053000.gpio
> 296:        246          0      CBAR  67 Edge    -00000000  OMAP UART0
> 311:        341          0      CBAR  51 Edge    -00000000  48070000.i2c
> 312:          3          0      CBAR  52 Edge    -00000000  48072000.i2c
> 313:          0          0      CBAR  56 Edge    -00000000  48060000.i2c
> 314:        255          0      CBAR  78 Edge    -00000000  mmc0
> 315:         40          0      CBAR  81 Edge    -00000000  mmc1
> 316:         13          0      CBAR  91 Edge    -00000000  mmc2
> 320:          0          0      CBAR  49 Edge    -00000000  4a140000.sata
> 324:          0          0      CBAR   1 Edge    -00000000  48078000.elm
> 325:          0          0      CBAR  15 Edge    -00000000  gpmc
> 333:          0          0      CBAR 335 Edge    -00000000  48484000.ethernet
> 334:          0          0      CBAR 336 Edge    -00000000  48484000.ethernet
> 415:          0          0   pcf857x   2 Edge    -00000000  btnUser1
> 416:          0          0   pcf857x   3 Edge    -00000000  btnUser2
> 445:          0          0   pinctrl 992 Edge    -00010000  4806a000.seria
> 
> / # cat /proc/interrupts -- after
> 230:          0          0      CBAR  30 Level   -00002004  48051000.gpio
> 263:          0          0      CBAR 116 Level   -00002004  48053000.gpio
> 296:        567          0      CBAR  67 Level   -00002004  OMAP UART0
> 311:        363          0      CBAR  51 Level   -00002004  48070000.i2c
> 312:          3          0      CBAR  52 Level   -00002004  48072000.i2c
> 313:          0          0      CBAR  56 Level   -00002004  48060000.i2c
> 314:        197          0      CBAR  78 Level   -00002004  mmc0
> 315:         40          0      CBAR  81 Level   -00002004  mmc1
> 316:         13          0      CBAR  91 Level   -00002004  mmc2
> 320:          0          0      CBAR  49 Level   -00002004  4a140000.sata
> 324:          0          0      CBAR   1 Level   -00002004  48078000.elm
> 325:          0          0      CBAR  15 Level   -00002004  gpmc
> 333:          0          0      CBAR 335 Level   -00002004  48484000.ethernet
> 334:          0          0      CBAR 336 Level   -00002004  48484000.ethernet
> 415:          0          0   pcf857x   2 Edge    -00000000  btnUser1
> 416:          4          2   pcf857x   3 Edge    -00000000  btnUser2
> 445:          0          0   pinctrl 992 Edge    -00010000  4806a000.serial
> 
> Fixes: 783d31863fb8 ('irqchip: crossbar: Convert dra7 crossbar to stacked domains')
> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko at ti.com>
> ---
> Hi All,
> 
> I can split patch if required and overall solution acceptable.

This looks good to me. Please repost it after splitting it in two
patches.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list