[PATCH v3 02/18] of/platform: add of_platform_probe
Tomeu Vizoso
tomeu.vizoso at collabora.com
Tue Aug 11 02:37:38 PDT 2015
On 7 August 2015 at 14:19, Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 04:11:39PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>
>> Walks the OF tree up and finds the closest ancestor that has a platform
>> device associated with it, probing it if isn't bound to a driver yet.
>
>> The above should ensure that the dependency represented by the passed OF
>> node is available, because probing a platform device should cause its
>> descendants to be probed as well.
>
> This sounds like it's going to break in the case where we have MFDs that
> represent their functions in DT (not a pattern I'm a fan of but it's a
> thing people do). We'll walk back to the platform device for the MFD
> function, try to probe it and then give up. Perhaps that's good enough
> anyway but it's not clear to me why we don't just try every parent we
> find?
Agreed. In the attempt at probing dependencies before a device is
probed, I considered that a device's parent is also a dependency and
that worked well. From what I saw, few devices will defer their probe
if their parent hasn't been probed yet, assuming that it will have
probed already. But with simple-mfd and simple-bus that shouldn't be
relied upon as things will break if their parents defer their probe.
With async probing enabled this failure scenario becomes more
probable.
> I'm also not a fan of the fact that the interface here is explicitly
> saying that we want to probe a platform device, that's an implementation
> detail that callers shouldn't need to know about. From the point of
> view of the callers what they're trying to do is kick any dependencies
> into being instantiated, the fact that we currently try to accomplish it
> with platform devices isn't something they care about.
Agreed.
Thanks,
Tomeu
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list